Cited by 108Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Improved anomaly detection by training an autoencoder with skip connections on images corrupted with Stain-shaped noise

Open access
Collin, Anne-Sophie, De Vleeschouwer, Christophe·2021·2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)

Abstract

In industrial vision, the anomaly detection problem can be addressed with an autoencoder trained to map an arbitrary image, i.e. with or without any defect, to a clean image, i.e. without any defect. In this approach, anomaly detection relies conventionally on the reconstruction residual or, alternatively, on the reconstruction uncertainty. To improve the sharpness of the reconstruction, we consider an autoencoder architecture with skip connections. In the common scenario where only clean images are available for training, we propose to corrupt them with a synthetic noise model to prevent the convergence of the network towards the identity mapping, and introduce an original Stain noise model for that purpose. We show that this model favors the reconstruction of clean images from arbitrary real-world images, regardless of the actual defects appearance. In addition to demonstrating the relevance of our approach, our validation provides the first consistent assessment of reconstruction-based methods, by comparing their performance over the MVTec AD dataset [1], both for pixel- and image-wise anomaly detection. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/anncollin/AnomalyDetection-Keras.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412842

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative Adversarial Nets," Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2672-2680, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collin, A.-S., & De Vleeschouwer, C.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-01-10
Pages
7915-7922
ISSN
1041-3278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082804066
Cited by
106
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8
FWCI
26.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
anomaly detection, autoencoder, skip connections, industrial vision, image reconstruction, reconstruction residuals, reconstruction uncertainty, MVTec AD

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review