The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) trained on code-completion have been shown to be capable of synthesizing simple Python programs from docstrings [1]. We find that these code-writing LLMs can be re-purposed to write robot policy code, given natural language commands. Specifically, policy code can express functions or feedback loops that process perception outputs (e.g., from object detectors [2], [3]) and parameterize control primitive APIs. When provided as input several example language commands (formatted as comments) followed by corresponding policy code (via few-shot prompting), LLMs can take in new commands and autonomously re-compose API calls to generate new policy code respectively. By chaining classic logic structures and referencing third-party libraries (e.g., NumPy, Shapely) to perform arithmetic, LLMs used in this way can write robot policies that (i) exhibit spatial-geometric reasoning, (ii) generalize to new instructions, and (iii) prescribe precise values (e.g., velocities) to ambiguous descriptions (‘faster’) depending on context (i.e., behavioral commonsense). This paper presents Code as Policies: a robot-centric formulation of language model generated programs (LMPs) that can represent reactive policies (e.g., impedance controllers), as well as waypoint-based policies (vision-based pick and place, trajectory-based control), demonstrated across multiple real robot platforms. Central to our approach is prompting hierarchical code-gen (recursively defining undefined functions), which can write more complex code and also improves state-of-the-art to solve 39.8% of problems on the HumanEval [1] benchmark. Code and videos are available at https://code-as-policies.github.io
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“LLM-generated robotic task plans are highly sensitive to prompt phrasing (Liang et al., 2023) and vulnerable to adversarial manipulation (Zhang et al., 2024c).”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Naive LLMs and VLMs generate plans step by step, lacking mechanisms to detect and correct earlier mistakes or execution errors (Liang et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2022b; Duan et al., 2024).”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Incorporating feedback mechanisms or explicit error-handling strategies significantly reduces these errors (Liang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023a).”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In personalization and embodied control, agents author and revise executable policies, simulators, and skill libraries in response to environment feedback [9, 10, 32].”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Programs are increasingly used as the medium through which LLM agents reason, act, and model their environments.”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Code and classical robotics software define the admissibility boundary by exposing typed robot APIs, parameterizing primitive skills, calling geometric libraries, invoking motion planners, and supporting inspection, replay, versioning, and verification [124, 10, 434, 435].”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whereas previous work needed to compose multiple models to this end (Ahn et al., 2022; Kwon et al., 2024; Liang et al., 2023; Vemprala et al., 2023)”
From Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World (2025) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Trained on large datasets of images and language, VLMs can provide powerful visual semantic understanding and useful guidance to robotic tasks, such as which object a manipulator should pick up or which goal a mobile robot should reach [8, 9, 10].”
From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Several works [8, 9, 10] have shown that language model are capable planners for robotic tasks.”
From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We opt to use code as the action space instead of low-level motor commands because programs can naturally represent temporally extended and compositional actions [16, 22], which are essential for many long-horizon tasks in Minecraft.”
From Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“robotic and embodied agents use generated programs as executable policies for interacting with physical or simulated worlds [9, 10]”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in large language model (LLM) based agents harness the world knowledge encapsulated in pre-trained LLMs to generate consistent action plans or executable policies [16, 22, 19].”
From Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As a grounding interface, it translates high-level intent from LLMs into embodiment-respecting commands through primitive skill calls [9, 110, 111, 112], synthesized Python control policies [10, 33, 124, 117, 118], and structured behavior-tree programs [34].”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many existing approaches leveraging foundation models include CodeAsPolicies [6], Voyager [35], VIMA [92], VoxPoser [77].”
From Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“there has been a performance revolution of sorts there (Yao et al., 2023b;Liang et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023b).”
From LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks (2024) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505
Self-citationTraining language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590
Large language models are zero-shot reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. (., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1613 · Cited by 2,013
Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge DistillationPreprint
Gu, X.-Y., Lin, T.-Y., Kuo, W.-C., & Cui, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.13921 · Cited by 1,464
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374 · Cited by 1,436
Understanding Natural Language Commands for Robotic Navigation and Mobile Manipulation
Tellex, S., Kollar, T., Dickerson, S., Walter, M. R., Banerjee, A., Teller, S. J., & Roy, N. (2011) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7979 · Cited by 903
MDETR - Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understanding
Kamath, A., Singh, M., LeCun, Y., Synnaeve, G., Misra, I., & Carion, N. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00180 · Cited by 802
Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances
Ahn, M., Brohan, A., Brown, N., Chebotar, Y., Cortes, O., David, B., Finn, C., Fu, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.01691 · Cited by 624
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- cideron, 2019, Self-educated language agent with hindsight experience replay for instruction following, DeepMind
- kalashnikov, 2018, Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation, CoRL
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 853
Luo, H., Wu, J., Liu, J., & Antwi‐Afari, M. F. (2024) · Developments in the Built Environment · doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100488 · Cited by 38
Interactive Planning Using Large Language Models for Partially Observable Robotic Tasks
Sun, L., Jha, D. K., Hori, C., Jain, S., Corcodel, R., Zhu, X., Tomizuka, M., & Romeres, D. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610981 · Cited by 38
How to Prompt Your Robot: A PromptBook for Manipulation Skills with Code as Policies
Arenas, M. G., Xiao, T. G., Singh, S., Jain, V., Ren, A. Z., Vuong, Q., Varley, J., Herzog, A., Leal, I. M. P., Kirmani, S., et al. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610784 · Cited by 40
Self-citationWu, D., Zheng, P., Zhao, Q., Zhang, S., Qi, J., Hu, J., Zhu, G., & Wang, L. (2025) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103064 · Cited by 38
RoboTwin: Dual-Arm Robot Benchmark with Generative Digital Twins
Mu, Y., Chen, T., Chen, Z., Peng, S., Lan, Z., Gao, Z., Liang, Z., Yu, Q., Zou, Y., Xu, M., et al. (2025) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.02575 · Cited by 65
Zhu, X., Chen, Y., Tian, H., Tao, C., Su, W., Yang, C., Huang, G., Li, B., Lu, L., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17144 · Cited by 33
CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agents
Park, J., Lim, S., Lee, J., Park, S., Chang, M., Yu, Y., & Choi, S. (2023) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3338514 · Cited by 44
AutoGPT+P: Affordance-based Task Planning with Large Language Models
Birr, T., Pohl, C., Younes, A., & Asfour, T. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems Conference · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.112 · Cited by 47
FoundationGrasp: Generalizable Task-Oriented Grasping With Foundation Models
Tang, C., Huang, D., Dong, W., Xu, R., & Zhang, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2025.3542418 · Cited by 40
A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models: Concepts, Methodologies, and Outlook
Sun, J., Zheng, C., Xie, E., Liu, Z., Chu, R., Qiu, J., Xu, J., Ding, M., Li, H., Geng, M., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3729218 · Cited by 45
Ma, F., Chen, J., Dai, Z., Cai, F., & Hu, Y. (2026) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2026.125886 · Cited by 33
Agashe, S., Fan, Y., Reyna, A., & Wang, X. E. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.448 · Cited by 32
Chen, L., Lei, Y., Jin, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3400189 · Cited by 35
Toward Grounded Commonsense Reasoning
Kwon, M., Hu, H., Myers, V., Karamcheti, S., Dragan, A. D., & Sadigh, D. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611218 · Cited by 41
Improving Vision-Language-Action Model with Online Reinforcement Learning
Guo, Y., Zhang, J.-K., Chen, X.-Y., Ji, X., Wang, Y.-J., Hu, Y.-C., & Chen, J.-Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127299 · Cited by 148
COHERENT: Collaboration of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot System with Large Language Models
Liu, K., Tang, Z., Wang, D., Wang, Z., Li, X., & Zhao, B. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127808 · Cited by 57
PlanAgent: A Multimodal Large Language Agent for Closed-Loop Vehicle Motion Planning
Zheng, Y., Xing, Z., Zhang, Q., Jin, B., Li, P., Zheng, Y., Xia, Z., Chen, Y., & Zhao, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2026.3664120 · Cited by 68
Language and Sketching: An LLM-driven Interactive Multimodal Multitask Robot Navigation Framework
Zu, W., Song, W., Chen, R., Guo, Z., Sun, F., Tian, Z., Pan, W., & Wang, J. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611462 · Cited by 31
Vision-language model-driven scene understanding and robotic object manipulation
Liu, S., Zhang, J., Gao, R. X., Wang, X. V., & Wang, L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) · doi:10.1109/case59546.2024.10711845 · Cited by 37
TypeFly: Low-Latency Drone Planning With Large Language Models
Chen, G., Yu, X., Ling, N., & Zhong, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3561282 · Cited by 31
Guiding Long-Horizon Task and Motion Planning with Vision Language Models
Yang, Z., Garrett, C. R., Fox, D., Lozano‐Pérez, T., & Kaelbling, L. P. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128705 · Cited by 31
Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks
Xing, W., Li, M., Li, M., & Han, M. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3806048 · Cited by 67
CoNVOI: Context-aware Navigation using Vision Language Models in Outdoor and Indoor Environments
Sathyamoorthy, A. J., Weerakoon, K., Elnoor, M., Zore, A., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Tan, J., Yu, W., & Manocha, D. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802716 · Cited by 46
Self-citationDeep reinforcement learning for robotic bipedal locomotion: a brief survey
Bao, L., Humphreys, J., Peng, T., & Zhou, C. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11451-z · Cited by 42
Obata, K., Aoki, T., Horii, T., Taniguchi, T., & Nagai, T. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3518105 · Cited by 40
Human–robot interaction through joint robot planning with large language models
Asuzu, K., Singh, H., & Idrissi, M. (2025) · Intelligent Service Robotics · doi:10.1007/s11370-024-00570-1 · Cited by 33
Bi-VLA: Vision-Language-Action Model-Based System for Bimanual Robotic Dexterous Manipulations
Gbagbe, K. F., Cabrera, M. A., Alabbas, A., Alyunes, O., Lykov, A., & Tsetserukou, D. (2024) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc54092.2024.10831380 · Cited by 29
Dong, W., Li, S., & Zheng, P. (2025) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4068235 · Cited by 30
VLM See, Robot Do: Human Demo Video to Robot Action Plan via Vision Language Model
Wang, B., Zhang, J., Dong, S., Fang, I., & Feng, C. (2025) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros60139.2025.11246682 · Cited by 69
Gen2Sim: Scaling up Robot Learning in Simulation with Generative Models
Katara, P., Xian, Z., & Fragkiadaki, K. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610566 · Cited by 45
Modular Visual Question Answering via Code Generation
Subramanian, S., Narasimhan, M., Khangaonkar, K., Yang, K., Nagrani, A., Schmid, C., Zeng, A., Darrell, T., & Klein, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.65 · Cited by 45
Self-citationLarge Language Models Are Neurosymbolic Reasoners
Fang, M., Deng, S., Zhang, Y., Shi, Z., Chen, L., Pechenizkiy, M., & Wang, Y.-X. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29754 · Cited by 44
SG-Bot: Object Rearrangement via Coarse-to-Fine Robotic Imagination on Scene Graphs
Zhai, G., Cai, X., Huang, D., Di, Y., Manhardt, F., Tombari, F., Navab, N., & Busam, B. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610792 · Cited by 33
Enhancing Robot Task Planning and Execution through Multi-Layer Large Language Models
Luan, Z., Lai, Y., Huang, R., Bai, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, Q. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24051687 · Cited by 31
Wang, Z., Wan, C., Liu, J., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Hu, Y., & Hu, Z. (2025) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2025.103527 · Cited by 30
Embodied AI: A Survey on the Evolution from Perceptive to Behavioral Intelligence
Yifan, C., Wei, M., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Song, H., Ma, L., Di, D., Sun, C., Liu, K., et al. (2025) · SmartBot · doi:10.1002/smb2.70003 · Cited by 30
Iterative Motion Editing with Natural Language
Goel, P., Wang, K.-C. J., Liu, C. K., & Fatahalian, K. (2024) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/3641519.3657447 · Cited by 35
Alam, M. F., Lentsch, A., Yu, N., Barmack, S., Kim, S., Acemoğlu, D., Hart, A. J., Johnson, S., & Ahmed, F. (2024) · doi:10.21428/e4baedd9.e39b392d · Cited by 31
Huang, S., Ponomarenko, I., Jiang, Z., Li, X., Hu, X., Gao, P., Li, H., & Dong, H. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801993 · Cited by 43
From text to motion: grounding GPT-4 in a humanoid robot “Alter3”
Yoshida, T., Masumori, A., & Ikegami, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1581110 · Cited by 33
Open-Ended Instructable Embodied Agents with Memory-Augmented Large Language Models
Sarch, G., Wu, Y., Tarr, M., & Fragkiadaki, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.226 · Cited by 25
EMOTION: Expressive Motion Sequence Generation for Humanoid Robots With In-Context Learning
Huang, P., Hu, Y., Nechyporenko, N., Kim, D., Talbott, W. A., & Zhang, J. (2025) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3575983 · Cited by 32
Sun, S., Liu, R., Lyu, J., Yang, J.-W., Zhang, L., & Li, X. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114065 · Cited by 43
Embodied AI with Foundation Models for Mobile Service Robots: A Systematic Review
Lisondra, M., Benhabib, B., & Nejat, G. (2026) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics15030055 · Cited by 32
Scaling Up and Distilling Down: Language-Guided Robot Skill Acquisition
Ha, H., Florence, P., & Song, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.14535 · Cited by 24
“Planar actions [10, 37] aren’t flexible enough to manipulate prismatic and revolute joints.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA robot operating system framework for using large language models in embodied AI
Mower, C. E., Wan, Y., Yu, H., Grosnit, A., Gonzalez-Billandon, J., Zimmer, M., Liu, P., Palenicek, D., Tateo, D., Peters, J., et al. (2026) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01186-z · Cited by 64
Closed-Loop Open-Vocabulary Mobile Manipulation with GPT-4V
Zhi, P.-Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Zhao, Y., Han, M., Zhang, Z.-Y., Li, Z.-T., Jiao, Z.-Y., Jia, B., & Huang, S.-Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127975 · Cited by 81
The New Agronomists: Language Models are Experts in Crop Management
Wu, J., Lai, Z., Chen, S., Tao, R., Pan, Z., & Hovakimyan, N. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00543 · Cited by 35
REAL: Resilience and Adaptation using Large Language Models on Autonomous Aerial Robots
Tagliabue, A., Kondo, K., Zhao, T., Peterson, M. B., Tewari, C. T., & How, J. P. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc56724.2024.10885890 · Cited by 29
Language, Camera, Autonomy! Prompt-engineered Robot Control for Rapidly Evolving Deployment
Macdonald, J. P., Mallick, R., Wollaber, A., Peña, J., McNeese, N. J., & Siu, H. C. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640671 · Cited by 26
Liu, C., & Nie, Q. (2025) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2025.110889 · Cited by 24
SELP: Generating Safe and Efficient Task Plans for Robot Agents with Large Language Models
Wu, Y., Xiong, Z., Hu, Y.-R., Iyengar, S. S., Jiang, N., Bera, A., Tan, L., & Jagannathan, S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128420 · Cited by 49
Application of Pretrained Large Language Models in Embodied Artificial Intelligence
Kovalev, A. K., & Panov, A. I. (2022) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562422060138 · Cited by 23
Skill Transformer: A Monolithic Policy for Mobile Manipulation
Huang, X., Batra, D., Rai, A., & Szot, A. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00996 · Cited by 23
Optimal Scene Graph Planning with Large Language Model Guidance
Dai, Z., Asgharivaskasi, A., Duong, T., Lin, S., Tzes, M., Pappas, G. J., & Atanasov, N. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610599 · Cited by 32
Kinematic-aware Prompting for Generalizable Articulated Object Manipulation with LLMs
Xia, W., Wang, D., Pang, X., Wang, Z., Zhao, B., Hu, D., & Li, X. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610744 · Cited by 26
Bridging language and action: A survey of language-conditioned robot manipulation
Yao, X., Zhou, H., Mees, O., Meng, Y., Xiao, T. G., Bisk, Y., Oh, J., Johns, E., Shridhar, M., Shah, D., et al. (2026) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783649261468360 · Cited by 56
Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robots
Ravichandran, Z., Robey, A., Kumar, V., Pappas, G., & Hassani, H. (2025) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2026.3667488 · Cited by 90
Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making
Li, M., Zhao, S., Wang, Q., Wang, K., Zhou, Y., Srivastava, S., Gokmen, C., Lee, T., Li, L., Zhang, R., et al. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-3188 · Cited by 21
Toward Cognitive Digital Twin System of Human-Robot Collaboration Manipulation
Li, X., He, B., Wang, Z., Zhou, Y., Li, G., & Li, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3452149 · Cited by 21
Feedback-Guided Autonomous Driving
Zhang, J., Huang, Z., Ray, A., & Ohn-Bar, E. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01421 · Cited by 24
Bianchi, L., Carrara, F., Messina, N., Gennaro, C., & Falchi, F. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02125 · Cited by 20
Wen, J., Li, Z., Xi, M., & He, J. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3540820 · Cited by 20
Roy, L., Croft, E. A., Ramirez, A., & Kulić, D. (2025) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3547631 · Cited by 20
ReMEmbR: Building and Reasoning Over Long-Horizon Spatio-Temporal Memory for Robot Navigation
Anwar, A., Welsh, J., Biswas, J., Pouya, S., & Chang, Y. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127706 · Cited by 60
Cui, C., Ma, Y., Park, S., Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Liu, P., Lu, J., Peng, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2026.3678829 · Cited by 37
NEWTON: Are Large Language Models Capable of Physical Reasoning?
Wang, Y., Duan, J., Fox, D., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.652 · Cited by 52
Izquierdo-Badiola, S., Canal, G., Rizzo, C., & Alenyà, G. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610055 · Cited by 21
PREGO: Online Mistake Detection in PRocedural EGOcentric Videos
Flaborea, A., di Melendugno, G. M. D., Plini, L., Scofano, L., Matteis, E. D., Furnari, A., Farinella, G. M., & Galasso, F. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01749 · Cited by 31
Energy-based Models are Zero-Shot Planners for Compositional Scene Rearrangement
Gkanatsios, N., Jain, A., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Atkeson, C. G., & Fragkiadaki, K. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.030 · Cited by 35
Text2Reaction : Enabling Reactive Task Planning Using Large Language Models
Yang, Z., Li, N., Wang, H., Jiang, T., Zhang, S., Cui, S., Jiang, H., Li, C., Wang, S., & Wang, Z. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3371223 · Cited by 21
Lifelong Robot Learning with Human Assisted Language Planners
Parakh, M., Fong, A., Simeonov, A., Chen, T., Gupta, A., & Agrawal, P. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610225 · Cited by 28
Ranasinghe, N., Mohammed, W. M., Stefanidis, K., & Lastra, J. L. M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3565918 · Cited by 19
Dadu-Corki: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Design for Embodied AI-powered Robotic Manipulation
Huang, Y., Hao, Y., Bo, Y., Yan, F., Yang, Y., Feng, M., Han, Y., Ma, L., Liu, S., Liu, Q., et al. (2025) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1145/3695053.3731099 · Cited by 27
Beyond Sight: Finetuning Generalist Robot Policies with Heterogeneous Sensors via Language Grounding
Jones, J., Mees, O., Sferrazza, C., Stachowicz, K., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127987 · Cited by 48
Pretrained Language Models as Visual Planners for Human Assistance
Patel, D., Eghbal-zadeh, H., Kamra, N., Iuzzolino, M. L., Jain, U., & Desai, R. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01404 · Cited by 22
Intrusion Detection Technology Based on Large Language Models
Lai, H. (2023) · International Conference on Evolutionary Algorithms and Soft Computing Techniques (EASCT) · doi:10.1109/easct59475.2023.10393509 · Cited by 18
Yang, R., Zhang, F., & Hou, M. (2024) · Workshop/Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems · doi:10.1145/3699432.3699496 · Cited by 36
TPML: Task Planning for Multi-UAV System with Large Language Models
Cui, J., Liu, G., Wang, H., Yu, Y., & Yang, J. (2024) · International Conference on Control and Automation · doi:10.1109/icca62789.2024.10591846 · Cited by 18
Can you pass that tool?: Implications of Indirect Speech in Physical Human-Robot Collaboration
Zhang, Y., Ratnayake, T. S., Sew, C., Knibbe, J., Gonçalves, J., & Johal, W. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713780 · Cited by 17
Qiu, J., Han, W., Zhu, J., Xu, M., Rosenberg, M., Liu, E., Weber, D. J., & Zhao, D. X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.33 · Cited by 21
Lin, Y., Li, C., Ding, M., Tomizuka, M., Zhan, W., & Althoff, M. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3441493 · Cited by 22
Audio Visual Language Maps for Robot Navigation
Huang, C., Mees, O., Zeng, A., & Burgard, W. (2024) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63596-0_10 · Cited by 22
Self-citationAction Contextualization: Adaptive Task Planning and Action Tuning Using Large Language Models
Gupta, S., Yao, K., Niederhauser, L., & Billard, A. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3460408 · Cited by 18
Leveraging large language models for comprehensive locomotion control in humanoid robots design
Sun, S., Li, C., Zhao, Z., Huang, H., & Xu, W. (2024) · Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.birob.2024.100187 · Cited by 18
BlenderAlchemy: Editing 3D Graphics with Vision-Language Models
Huang, I., Yang, G., & Guibas, L. J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73024-5_18 · Cited by 34
RoboGPT: An LLM-Based Long-Term Decision-Making Embodied Agent for Instruction Following Tasks
Chen, Y., Cui, W., Chen, Y., Tan, M., Xinyao, Z., Liu, J., Li, H., Zhao, D., & Wang, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2025.3543364 · Cited by 17
Transferring Foundation Models for Generalizable Robotic Manipulation
Yang, J., Tan, W., Jin, C., Yao, K., Liu, B., Fu, J., Song, R., Wu, G., & Wang, L. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00201 · Cited by 35
Human–robot collaborative visual inspection with Large Language Models
Tasneem, O., & Pieters, R. (2025) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103154 · Cited by 18
(2023) · International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering (WCSE) · doi:10.18178/wcse.2023.06.031 · Cited by 19
Unlocking Robotic Autonomy: A Survey on the Applications of Foundation Models
Jang, D.-S., Cho, D.-H., Lee, W.-C., Ryu, S.-K., Jeong, B.-M., Hong, M., Jung, M., Kim, M., Lee, M., Lee, S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Control Automation and Systems · doi:10.1007/s12555-024-0438-7 · Cited by 17
Probabilistically Correct Language-Based Multi-Robot Planning Using Conformal Prediction
Wang, J., He, G., & Kantaros, Y. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3504233 · Cited by 35
DeepSeek-V3, GPT-4, Phi-4, and LLaMA-3.3 Generate Correct Code for LoRaWAN-Related Engineering Tasks
Fernandes, D. F. S., Matos-Carvalho, J. P., Fernandes, C. M., & Fachada, N. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14071428 · Cited by 21
GSCE: a Prompt Framework With Enhanced Reasoning for Reliable LLM-Driven Drone Control
Wang, W., Li, Y., Jiao, L., & Yuan, J. (2025) · International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) · doi:10.1109/icuas65942.2025.11007864 · Cited by 16
Safety Aware Task Planning via Large Language Models in Robotics
Khan, A. A., Andrev, M., Murtaza, M. A., Aguilera, S., Zhang, R., Ding, J., Hutchinson, S., & Anwar, A. (2025) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros60139.2025.11246041 · Cited by 16
Foundation models assist in human–robot collaboration assembly
Ji, Y., Zhang, Z., Tang, D., Zheng, Y., Liu, C., Zhao, Z., & Li, X. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-75715-4 · Cited by 20
Chartist: Task-driven Eye Movement Control for Chart Reading
Shi, D., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., Bulling, A., & Oulasvirta, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713128 · Cited by 24
LAMARL: LLM-Aided Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Policy Generation
Zhu, G., Zhou, R., Ji, W., & Zhao, S. (2025) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3577527 · Cited by 21
Examining the Expanding Role of Synthetic Data Throughout the AI Development Pipeline
Kapania, S., Ballard, S. A., Kessler, A., & Vaughan, J. W. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732005 · Cited by 19
Beyond Syntax: Exploring Moroccan Undergraduate with AI-Assisted Writing
Moussa, A., & Belhiah, H. (2024) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/chatgpt.9 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, J., Huang, W., Xia, F., Xu, P., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., Florence, P., & Zeng, A.
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-05-29
- Pages
- 9493-9500
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383097638
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 231 · 2025: 286 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 48
- FWCI
- 327.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- large language models, code generation, robot policy, embodied control, natural language commands, few-shot prompting, trajectory-based control, impedance control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review