The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) trained on code-completion have been shown to be capable of synthesizing simple Python programs from docstrings [1]. We find that these code-writing LLMs can be re-purposed to write robot policy code, given natural language commands. Specifically, policy code can express functions or feedback loops that process perception outputs (e.g., from object detectors [2], [3]) and parameterize control primitive APIs. When provided as input several example language commands (formatted as comments) followed by corresponding policy code (via few-shot prompting), LLMs can take in new commands and autonomously re-compose API calls to generate new policy code respectively. By chaining classic logic structures and referencing third-party libraries (e.g., NumPy, Shapely) to perform arithmetic, LLMs used in this way can write robot policies that (i) exhibit spatial-geometric reasoning, (ii) generalize to new instructions, and (iii) prescribe precise values (e.g., velocities) to ambiguous descriptions (‘faster’) depending on context (i.e., behavioral commonsense). This paper presents Code as Policies: a robot-centric formulation of language model generated programs (LMPs) that can represent reactive policies (e.g., impedance controllers), as well as waypoint-based policies (vision-based pick and place, trajectory-based control), demonstrated across multiple real robot platforms. Central to our approach is prompting hierarchical code-gen (recursively defining undefined functions), which can write more complex code and also improves state-of-the-art to solve 39.8% of problems on the HumanEval [1] benchmark. Code and videos are available at https://code-as-policies.github.io
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“LLM-generated robotic task plans are highly sensitive to prompt phrasing (Liang et al., 2023) and vulnerable to adversarial manipulation (Zhang et al., 2024c).”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Naive LLMs and VLMs generate plans step by step, lacking mechanisms to detect and correct earlier mistakes or execution errors (Liang et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2022b; Duan et al., 2024).”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Incorporating feedback mechanisms or explicit error-handling strategies significantly reduces these errors (Liang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023a).”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In personalization and embodied control, agents author and revise executable policies, simulators, and skill libraries in response to environment feedback [9, 10, 32].”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Programs are increasingly used as the medium through which LLM agents reason, act, and model their environments.”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Code and classical robotics software define the admissibility boundary by exposing typed robot APIs, parameterizing primitive skills, calling geometric libraries, invoking motion planners, and supporting inspection, replay, versioning, and verification [124, 10, 434, 435].”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whereas previous work needed to compose multiple models to this end (Ahn et al., 2022; Kwon et al., 2024; Liang et al., 2023; Vemprala et al., 2023)”
From Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World (2025) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Trained on large datasets of images and language, VLMs can provide powerful visual semantic understanding and useful guidance to robotic tasks, such as which object a manipulator should pick up or which goal a mobile robot should reach [8, 9, 10].”
From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Several works [8, 9, 10] have shown that language model are capable planners for robotic tasks.”
From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We opt to use code as the action space instead of low-level motor commands because programs can naturally represent temporally extended and compositional actions [16, 22], which are essential for many long-horizon tasks in Minecraft.”
From Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“robotic and embodied agents use generated programs as executable policies for interacting with physical or simulated worlds [9, 10]”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in large language model (LLM) based agents harness the world knowledge encapsulated in pre-trained LLMs to generate consistent action plans or executable policies [16, 22, 19].”
From Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As a grounding interface, it translates high-level intent from LLMs into embodiment-respecting commands through primitive skill calls [9, 110, 111, 112], synthesized Python control policies [10, 33, 124, 117, 118], and structured behavior-tree programs [34].”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many existing approaches leveraging foundation models include CodeAsPolicies [6], Voyager [35], VIMA [92], VoxPoser [77].”
From Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“there has been a performance revolution of sorts there (Yao et al., 2023b;Liang et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023b).”
From LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks (2024) · cites this paper as Liang et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505
Self-citationTraining language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590
Large language models are zero-shot reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. (., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1613 · Cited by 2,013
Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge DistillationPreprint
Gu, X.-Y., Lin, T.-Y., Kuo, W.-C., & Cui, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.13921 · Cited by 1,464
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374 · Cited by 1,436
Understanding Natural Language Commands for Robotic Navigation and Mobile Manipulation
Tellex, S., Kollar, T., Dickerson, S., Walter, M. R., Banerjee, A., Teller, S. J., & Roy, N. (2011) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7979 · Cited by 903
MDETR - Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understanding
Kamath, A., Singh, M., LeCun, Y., Synnaeve, G., Misra, I., & Carion, N. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00180 · Cited by 802
Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances
Ahn, M., Brohan, A., Brown, N., Chebotar, Y., Cortes, O., David, B., Finn, C., Fu, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.01691 · Cited by 624
Self-citationTraining Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14168 · Cited by 575
A systematic evaluation of large language models of code
Xu, F. F., Alon, U., Neubig, G., & Hellendoorn, V. J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming · doi:10.1145/3520312.3534862 · Cited by 540
Procedures as a representation for data in a computer program for understanding natural language
Winograd, T. A. (1971) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 520
Breazeal, C., Dautenhahn, K., & Kanda, T. (2016) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_72 · Cited by 429
Weakly Supervised Learning of Semantic Parsers for Mapping Instructions to Actions
Artzi, Y., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2013) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00209 · Cited by 408
Program Synthesis with Large Language Models
Austin, J., Odena, A., Nye, M., Bosma, M., Michalewski, H., Dohan, D., Jiang, E., Cai, C., Terry, M., Le, Q., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07732 · Cited by 388
Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models
Zhou, D., Schärli, N., Hou, L., Wei, J., Scales, N., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Cui, C., Bousquet, O., Le, Q., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.10625 · Cited by 380
Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models
Lewkowycz, A., Andreassen, A., Dohan, D., Dyer, E., Michalewski, H., Ramasesh, V., Slone, A., Anil, C., Schlag, I., Gutman-Solo, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.14858 · Cited by 358 · cited 1×
“Large language models exhibit impressive zero-shot reasoning capabilities: from planning [14] to writing math programs [43]; from solving science problems [44] to using trained verifiers [45] for math word problems.”
Background(2022) · doi:10.52202/068431-0278 · Cited by 358
Learning to Parse Natural Language Commands to a Robot Control System
Matuszek, C., Herbst, E. V., Zettlemoyer, L., & Fox, D. (2013) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00065-7_28 · Cited by 331
Walk the talk: connecting language, knowledge, and action in route instructions
MacMahon, M., Stankiewicz, B. J., & Kuipers, B. J. (2006) · Cited by 306
Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents
Huang, W., Abbeel, P., Pathak, D., & Mordatch, I. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.07207 · Cited by 304
Self-citationToward understanding natural language directions
Kollar, T., Tellex, S., Roy, D. K., & Roy, N. (2010) · Cited by 287
Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models
Huang, W., Xia, F., Xiao, T., Chan, H., Liang, J., Florence, P., Zeng, A., Tompson, J., Mordatch, I., Chebotar, Y., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05608 · Cited by 287 · cited 6×
“…shows that large language models (LLMs) pretrained on Internet-scale data [11]–[13] exhibit out-of-the-box capabilities [14]–[16] that can be applied to language-using robots e.g., planning a sequence of steps from natural language instructions [16]–[18] without additional model finetuning.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA Survey of Reinforcement Learning Informed by Natural Language
Luketina, J., Nardelli, N., Farquhar, G., Foerster, J., Andreas, J., Grefenstette, E., Whiteson, S., & Rocktäschel, T. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/880 · Cited by 279
Language-Conditioned Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation TasksPreprint
Stepputtis, S., Campbell, J., Phielipp, M., Lee, S., Baral, C., & Amor, H. B. (2020) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12083 · Cited by 263
Tellex, S., Gopalan, N., Kress‐Gazit, H., & Matuszek, C. (2020) · Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-101119-071628 · Cited by 239
CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulation
Shridhar, M., Manuelli, L., & Fox, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.12098 · Cited by 223
Mapping Instructions and Visual Observations to Actions with Reinforcement Learning
Misra, D. K., Langford, J. C., & Artzi, Y. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1106 · Cited by 217
Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Language
Zeng, A., Attarian, M., Ichter, B., Choromanski, K., Wong, A., Welker, S., Tombari, F., Purohit, A., Ryoo, M., Sindhwani, V., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.00598 · Cited by 205
Self-citationCompositionality Decomposed: How do Neural Networks Generalise?
Hupkes, D., Dankers, V., Mul, M., & Bruni, E. (2020) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11674 · Cited by 194
Mees, O., Hermann, L., Rosete-Beas, E., & Burgard, W. B. (2022) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3180108 · Cited by 189
Drori, I., Zhang, S., Shuttleworth, R., Tang, L., Lu, A., Ke, E., Liu, K., Chen, L., Tran, S., Cheng, N., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2123433119 · Cited by 187
LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Action
Shah, D., Osinski, B., Ichter, B., & Levine, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.04429 · Cited by 179
Self-citationDzifcak, J., Scheutz, M. J., Baral, C. R., & Schermerhorn, P. (2009) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2009.5152776 · Cited by 175
BC-Z: Zero-Shot Task Generalization with Robotic Imitation Learning
Jang, E., Irpan, A., Khansari, M., Kappler, D., Ebert, F., Lynch, C., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.02005 · Cited by 167
Correcting Robot Plans with Natural Language Feedback
Sharma, P., Sundaralingam, B., Blukis, V., Paxton, C., Hermans, T., Torralba, A. B., Andreas, J., & Fox, D. (2022) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2022.xviii.065 · Cited by 138
Learning to interpret natural language commands through human-robot dialog
Thomason, J., Zhang, S., Mooney, R. J., & Stone, P. (2015) · Cited by 138
Florence, P., Lynch, C., Zeng, A., Ramirez, O., Wahid, A., Downs, L., Wong, A., Lee, J., Mordatch, I., & Tompson, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.00137 · Cited by 131
Self-citationDreamCoder: growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake–sleep Bayesian program learning
Ellis, K., Wong, L., Nye, M., Sablé-Meyer, M., Cary, L., Anaya Pozo, L., Hewitt, L., Solar-Lezama, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0050 · Cited by 125
Andreas, J., Klein, D., & Levine, S. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1197 · Cited by 109
Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning
Jiang, Y., Gu, S., Murphy, K., & Finn, C. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.07343 · Cited by 109
Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback
Wu, J., Ouyang, L., Ziegler, D. M., Stiennon, N., Lowe, R., Leike, J., & Christiano, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.10862 · Cited by 76
PixL2R: Guiding Reinforcement Learning Using Natural Language by Mapping Pixels to RewardsPreprint
Goyal, P., Niekum, S., & Mooney, R. (2020) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.15543 · Cited by 63
Learning Language-Conditioned Robot Behavior from Offline Data and Crowd-Sourced AnnotationPreprint
Nair, S., Mitchell, E., Chen, K., Ichter, B., Savarese, S., & Finn, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01115 · Cited by 60
Self-citationStructFormer: Learning Spatial Structure for Language-Guided Semantic Rearrangement of Novel Objects
Liu, W., Paxton, C., Hermans, T., & Fox, D. (2022) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811931 · Cited by 59
Bucker, A., Figueredo, L., Haddadinl, S., Kapoor, A., Ma, S., & Bonatti, R. (2022) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981810 · Cited by 55
Jointly Improving Parsing and Perception for Natural Language Commands through Human-Robot Dialog
Thomason, J., Padmakumar, A., Sinapov, J., Walker, N., Jiang, Y., Yedidsion, H., Hart, J., Stone, P., & Mooney, R. J. (2020) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11485 · Cited by 45
XIRL: Cross-embodiment inverse reinforcement learning
Zakka, K., Zeng, A., Florence, P., Tompson, J., Bohg, J., & Dwibedi, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.03911 · Cited by 38
Self-citationSORNet: Spatial Object-Centric Representations for Sequential ManipulationPreprint
Yuan, W., Paxton, C., Desingh, K., & Fox, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03891 · Cited by 28
Grounding Language to Autonomously-Acquired Skills via Goal GenerationPreprint
Akakzia, A., Colas, C., Oudeyer, P., Chétouani, M., & Sigaud, O. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07185 · Cited by 27
Composing Pick-and-Place Tasks by Grounding Language
Mees, O., & Burgard, W. (2021) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71151-1_43 · Cited by 22
Learning to Synthesize Programs as Interpretable and Generalizable PoliciesPreprint
Trivedi, D., Zhang, J. M., Sun, S.-H., & Lim, J. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.13643 · Cited by 22
HIGhER : Improving instruction following with Hindsight Generation for Experience ReplayPreprint
Cideron, G., Seurin, M., Strub, F., & Pietquin, O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.09451 · Cited by 20
Language Conditioned Imitation Learning over Unstructured Data
Lynch, C., & Sermanet, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.07648 · Cited by 18
Learning abstract structure for drawing by efficient motor program inductionPreprint
Tian, L. Y., Ellis, K., Kryven, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.03519 · Cited by 18
Implicit Kinematic Policies: Unifying Joint and Cartesian Action Spaces in End-to-End Robot Learning
Ganapathi, A., Florence, P., Varley, J., Burns, K., Goldberg, K. Y., & Zeng, A. (2022) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812165 · Cited by 18
Self-citationLearning Visual Affordances for Robotic Manipulation
Zeng, A. (2019) · Cited by 17
Self-citationLearning Perceptual Concepts by Bootstrapping From Human Queries
Bobu, A., Paxton, C., Yang, W., Sundaralingam, B., Chao, Y.-W., Çakmak, M., & Fox, D. (2022) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3196164 · Cited by 8
OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models
Zhang, S., Roller, S., Goyal, N., Artetxe, M., Chen, M., Chen, S., Dewan, C., Diab, M., Li, X., Lin, X. V., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01068
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- cideron, 2019, Self-educated language agent with hindsight experience replay for instruction following, DeepMind
- kalashnikov, 2018, Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation, CoRL
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
(2022) · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.025 · Cited by 916
Self-citationChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilities
Vemprala, S. H., Bonatti, R., Bucker, A., & Kapoor, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3387941 · Cited by 570
DriveGPT4: Interpretable End-to-End Autonomous Driving Via Large Language Model
Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Xie, E., Zhen, Z., Guo, Y. F., Wong, K. K., Li, Z., & Zhao, H. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3440097 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, J., Huang, W., Xia, F., Xu, P., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., Florence, P., & Zeng, A.
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-05-29
- Pages
- 9493-9500
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383097638
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 231 · 2025: 286 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 48
- FWCI
- 327.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- large language models, code generation, robot policy, embodied control, natural language commands, few-shot prompting, trajectory-based control, impedance control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
