Cited by 13Teaching and Learning ProgrammingOnline Learning and AnalyticsCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Morning or Evening? An Examination of Circadian Rhythms of CS1 Students

Open access
Zavgorodniaia, Albina, Shrestha, Raj, Leinonen, Juho, Hellas, Arto, Edwards, John·2021·2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET)

Abstract

Circadian rhythms are the cycles of our internal clock that play a key role in governing when we sleep and when we are active. A related concept is chronotype, which is a person's natural tendency toward activity at certain times of day and typically governs when the individual is most alert and productive. In this work we investigate chronotypes in the setting of an Introductory Computer Programming (CS1) course. Using keystroke data collected from students we investigate the existence of chronotypes through unsupervised learning. The chronotypes we find align with those of typical populations reported in the literature and our results support correlations of certain chronotypes to academic achievement. We also find a lack of support for the still-popular stereotype of a computer programmer as a night owl. The analyses are conducted on data from two universities, one in the US and one in Europe, that use different teaching methods. In comparison of the two contexts, we look into programming assignment design and administration that may promote better programming practices among students in terms of procrastination and effort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icse-seet52601.2021.00036

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some work has used fine-grained programming process logs from instrumented IDEs to uncover student work patterns and to visualize student programming processes.

    “Some work has looked into using fine-grained programming process logs gathered from instrumented IDEs to uncover student work patterns [21-23, 26, 40] and to visualize student programming processes [10,14,35,38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavgorodniaia, A., Shrestha, R., Leinonen, J., Hellas, A., & Edwards, J.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-05
Pages
261-272
OpenAlex
W3133616997
Cited by
13
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
circadian rhythm, chronotype, CS1 course, introductory programming, keystroke data, academic performance, procrastination, student effort, unsupervised learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review