CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Guides Our Choices? Modeling Developers' Trust and Behavioral Intentions Towards Genai

Choudhuri, Rudrajit, Trinkenreich, Bianca, Pandita, Rahul, Kalliamvakou, Eirini, Steinmacher, Igor, Gerosa, Marco, Sanchez, Christopher, Sarma, Anita·2025·2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
DOI 10.1109/icse55347.2025.00087
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icse55347.2025.00087

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 PLS-SEM Model: Solid lines indicate item loadings and path coefficients (p < 0.05); dashed lines represent non-significant paths. Reverse-coded items are suffixed with '-R' (e.g., SE2-R). Latent constructs are depicted as circles and adjusted R 2 (Adj. R 2 ) values are reported for endogenous constructs.
Fig. 1 PLS-SEM Model: Solid lines indicate item loadings and path coefficients (p < 0.05); dashed lines represent non-significant paths. Reverse-coded items are suffixed with '-R' (e.g., SE2-R). Latent constructs are depicted as circles and adjusted R 2 (Adj. R 2 ) values are reported for endogenous constructs.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 2024, OpenAI
  2. 2024, Microsoft
  3. 10.1109/ICSE-FoSE59343.2023.00008 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kalliamvakou, 2024, A developer’s second brain: Reducing complexity through partnership with AI
  5. Center, 2023, Siemens and microsoft partner to drive cross-industry AI adoption
  6. 2024, McKinsey
  7. 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1145/3637865 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/1541931213601672 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/ICSE-SEIP58684.2023.00043 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.5040/9781350374430 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/VLHCC.2004.28 · DOI
  13. 2023, AI mislabeled essays by non-native english speakers as bots
  14. Eubanks, 2018, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor
  15. 10.2307/30036540 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.2307/41410412 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/iwc/iwv046 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/3597503.3639097 · DOI
  21. 2024, Github inc
  22. 2024, Microsoft
  23. 10.1145/3531146.3533182 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1145/3544549.3585808 · DOI
  25. Hopkins, 1998, Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation
  26. 10.1145/3442188.3445923 · DOI · Paper page
  27. DeVellis, 2021, Scale development: Theory and applications
  28. Madsen, 2000, Measuring human-computer trust, 53, 6
  29. Scharowski, 2024, To trust or distrust trust measures: Validating questionnaires for trust in AI, arXiv preprint
  30. 10.1109/DCOSS-IoT58021.2023.00084 · DOI
  31. 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1177/0018720811411912 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Weisz, 2023, Toward general design principles for generative AI applications, arXiv preprint
  34. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121763 · DOI
  35. 10.1145/3490099.3511157 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1145/3663740 · DOI
  37. 10.1145/3510458.3513009 · DOI
  38. Hamid, 2024, Improving user mental models of XAI systems with inclusive design approaches, arXiv preprint
  39. 10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_27 · DOI
  40. 10.4135/9781446287866 · DOI
  41. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Supplemental package
  43. 10.1080/00050069408257324 · DOI
  44. 10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00038 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_9 · DOI
  46. Lord, 2008, Statistical theories of mental test scores
  47. 10.4324/9780203841624 · DOI
  48. 2024, Jasp (version 0.16.4) [computer software]
  49. Harrington, 2009, Confirmatory factor analysis
  50. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.2307/2334770 · DOI
  52. 10.1201/b15854-13 · DOI
  53. 10.4324/9781410610904 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1145/302979.303001 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.2307/30036519 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865 · DOI
  58. 10.1177/2041386619873616 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007 · DOI
  60. 10.1145/2531602.2531722 · DOI
  61. 10.1145/2786805.2786816 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.001 · DOI
  64. Bandura, 1997, Self-efficacy the exercise of control. new york:H, 333, 48461
  65. 10.2307/249688 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104259 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1016/B978-155860808-5/50015-0 · DOI
  70. 10.1145/3447580 · DOI
  71. 2024, Smartpls (version 4.1.0) [computer software]
  72. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.4018/ijec.2014010101 · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.4324/9780203771587 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3 · DOI
  77. Chin, 1998, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, Modern methods for business research, 295, 295
  78. 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049 · DOI
  81. 10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1145/3290605.3300233 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 2023, People+AI guidebook
  84. 10.1145/3287560.3287563 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1145/3241743 · DOI
  86. 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Choudhuri, R., Trinkenreich, B., Pandita, R., Kalliamvakou, E., Steinmacher, I., Gerosa, M., Sanchez, C., & Sarma, A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University,United States
  • GitHub Inc.,San Francisco,United States
  • Northern Arizona University,United States
Venue
2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-04-26
Pages
1691-1703
DOI
10.1109/icse55347.2025.00087
Cited by
17
References
18
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation (2235601,2236198,2247929,2303042,2303043)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review