Cited by 76Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing the Impact of Phase-Change Memory Conductance Drift on the Inference of large-scale Hardware Neural Networks

Ambrogio, S., Gallot, M., Spoon, K., Tsai, H., Mackin, C., Wesson, M., Kariyappa, S., Narayanan, P., Liu, C.-C., Kumar, A., Chen, A., Burr, G. W.·2019·2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)

Abstract

We extensively analyze the impact of conductance "drift" - inherent to Phase Change Memory (PCM) devices - on the inference of pre-trained Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Starting from large-array experimental characterization of PCM drift in partial-SET states, we build a statistical model of conductance drift capturing the cycle-to-cycle variability in drift-coefficient ν observed empirically. Using a variety of small and large DNNs (few-layer perceptrons using MNIST dataset, ResNet-(10,18,34) using CIFAR-10, and a 2-layer LSTM using "Alice in Wonderland"), we characterize how the combination of drift and ν-variability can induce long-term degradations in DNN accuracy. We then introduce several techniques to suppress these effects, including "slope correction" and modifications to the DNN architecture (choice of squashing function, the number of hidden units, hidden layers, or convolution filters). Finally, we show how noise sources such as 1/f and Random Telegraph Noise (RTN), and device-to-device variability in heater diameter, can complicate the accurate measurement of PCM drift.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iedm19573.2019.8993482

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. kim, 2013, IEDM Tech Dig, 30t
  2. boybat, 2018, Proc NVMTS, 1
  3. 10.1109/TED.2010.2058771 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/TED.2015.2477135 · DOI
  5. lung, 2016, Proc IEEE IM, 1
  6. chang, 2019, IBM J R&D
  7. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00333 · DOI · Paper page
  8. tsai, 2019, VLSI Symp
  9. sebastian, 2019, VLSI Symp, jf s3-2
  10. 10.1002/aelm.201900026 · DOI · Paper page
  11. burr, 2014, IEDM Tech Dig, 29t
  12. 10.1063/1.4718574 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ambrogio, S., Gallot, M., Spoon, K., Tsai, H., Mackin, C., Wesson, M., Kariyappa, S., Narayanan, P., Liu, C.-C., Kumar, A., Chen, A., & Burr, G. W.
Affiliations
IBM Research - Almaden (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-12
Pages
6.1.1-6.1.4
ISSN
0163-1918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005874416
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14
FWCI
17.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Technical digest - International Electron Devices Meeting/Technical digest (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
Keywords
phase-change memory, conductance drift, neural network hardware, neural network inference, cycle-to-cycle variation, slope correction, device-to-device variation, random telegraph noise, 1/f noise, hardware accelerators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review