Cited by 26Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsLow-power high-performance VLSI design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward Software-Equivalent Accuracy on Transformer-Based Deep Neural Networks With Analog Memory Devices

Open access
Spoon, Katie, Tsai, Hsinyu, Chen, An, Rasch, Malte J., Ambrogio, Stefano, Mackin, Charles, Fasoli, Andrea, Friz, Alexander M., Narayanan, Pritish, Stanisavljevic, Milos, Burr, Geoffrey W.·2021·Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Abstract

Recent advances in deep learning have been driven by ever-increasing model sizes, with networks growing to millions or even billions of parameters. Such enormous models call for fast and energy-efficient hardware accelerators. We study the potential of Analog AI accelerators based on Non-Volatile Memory, in particular Phase Change Memory (PCM), for software-equivalent accurate inference of natural language processing applications. We demonstrate a path to software-equivalent accuracy for the GLUE benchmark on BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), by combining noise-aware training to combat inherent PCM drift and noise sources, together with reduced-precision digital attention-block computation down to INT6.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fncom.2021.675741

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Agirre, 2007, Proceedings Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval), 10.3115/1621474 · DOI
  2. Bar-Haim, 2006, The second PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge,
  3. Bentivogli, 2009, The fifth PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge,
  4. Burr, 2016, Recent progress in PCM technology, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circ. Sys., 6, 146, 10.1109/JETCAS.2016.2547718 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Burr, 2017, Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory, Adv. Phys. X, 2, 89, 10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585 · DOI
  6. Chang, 2019, Ai hardware acceleration with analog memory: microarchitectures for low energy at high speed, IBM J. Res. Dev., 8, 1, 10.1147/JRD.2019.2934050 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dagan, 2006, The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge,, 177, 10.1007/11736790_9 · DOI
  8. Dolan, 2005, Automatically constructing a corpus of sentential paraphrases,
  9. Giampiccolo, 2007, The third PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge,, Proceedings ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, 1
  10. Giannopoulos, 2018, 8-bit precision in-memory multiplication with projected phase-change memory,, 27.7.1, 10.1109/IEDM.2018.8614558 · DOI
  11. Ielmini, 2007, Recovery and drift dynamics of resistance and threshold voltages in phase-change memories, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., 54, 308, 10.1109/TED.2006.888752 · DOI
  12. Lan, 2020, ALBERT: a lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations
  13. Matsukura, 2015, Control of magnetism by electric fields, Nat. Nanotechnol., 10, 209, 10.1038/nnano.2015.22 · DOI
  14. Paszke, 2019, Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, NIPS, 32, 8026
  15. Rajpurkar, 2016, SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text,, Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2383, 10.18653/v1/D16-1264 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Socher, 2013, Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank,, Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1631
  17. Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need,
  18. Wang, 2019, GLUE:a multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding,
  19. Warstadt, 2018, Neural network acceptability judgments, arXiv preprint 1805.12471 · arXiv
  20. Wolf, 2020, Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing,, 38
  21. Wong, 2012, Metal-Oxide RRAM, Proc. IEEE, 100, 1951, 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190369 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Spoon, K., Tsai, H., Chen, A., Rasch, M. J., Ambrogio, S., Mackin, C., Fasoli, A., Friz, A. M., Narayanan, P., Stanisavljevic, M., & Burr, G. W.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Almaden (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Spoon, Katie
Venue
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Published
2021-07-05
Volume
15
Pages
675741-675741
ISSN
1662-5188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184497370
Cited by
26
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
phase-change memory, non-volatile memory, BERT, GLUE benchmark, noise-aware training, INT6, attention blocks, energy-efficient hardware

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review