CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ChatGPT -Boon or Bane: A Study from Students Perspective

Wagholikar, Smita, Chandani, Arti, Atiq, Rizwana, Pathak, Mohit, Wagholikar, Omkar·2023·2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT)
DOI 10.1109/incacct57535.2023.10141820
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ChatGPT has taken given shocks and tremors to the online community within a few days of its launch. It has become the talk of the town, and people are discussing and deliberating what ChatGPT can and cannot do. ChatGPT is based on artificial intelligence and acts like humans, which makes it difficult to distinguish who is behind the scene. This study highlights the difference between ChatGPT and other Artificial Intelligence-based applications. ChatGPT was primarily introduced to help medical students with their writing requirements and has seen its application in other fields alike. The present study also empirically examines the awareness of ChatGPT among the students. The study attempts to find whether is there any difference in awareness of ChatGPT based on gender or the field of study among the students. The study results report that awareness of ChatGPT is not different across students of both genders and does differ based on the area of the study. Additionally, this study focuses on the application of ChatGPT along with the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT. The study is useful to educators and teachers who are teaching at various levels. The study also finds its acceptability among academicians who are not sure how ChatGPT can change the education and evaluation of assessments. The study has been written in the early stages of the launch of ChatGPT and gives a perspective on the benefits and challenges of ChatGPT to the academic fraternity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/incacct57535.2023.10141820

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies involved faculty and mostly medical students, but also other health-related students from countries worldwide, including Europe, the Middle East, northern and sub-Saharan Africa, North America, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand.

    “These studies involved faculty and mostly medical students, but also other health-related students from countries worldwide, including Europe, the Middle East, northern and sub-Saharan Africa, North America, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand [24–29].”

    From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2023, Introducing chatgpt, Introducing ChatGPT
  2. jiao, 2023, Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? A preliminary study, arXivLabs

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Wagholikar, S., Chandani, A., Atiq, R., Pathak, M., & Wagholikar, O.
Affiliations
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
  • Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN)
  • Integral University (IN)
  • RV University (IN)
  • Pune Institute of Computer Technology,Pune,India
ORCID
Venue
2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-05-05
Pages
207-212
DOI
10.1109/incacct57535.2023.10141820
OpenAlex
W4379875128
Cited by
13
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, student awareness, medical students, gender differences, field of study, academic writing, assessment evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review