Cited by 430Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotic Locomotion and ControlProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Learning to Walk Via Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Haarnoja, Tuomas, Ha, Sehoon, Zhou, Aurick, Tan, Jie, Tucker, George, Levine, Sergey·2019·Robotics: Science and Systems XV

Abstract

Deep reinforcement learning (deep RL) holds the promise of automating the acquisition of complex controllers that can map sensory inputs directly to low-level actions.In the domain of robotic locomotion, deep RL could enable learning locomotion skills with minimal engineering and without an explicit model of the robot dynamics.Unfortunately, applying deep RL to real-world robotic tasks is exceptionally difficult, primarily due to poor sample complexity and sensitivity to hyperparameters.While hyperparameters can be easily tuned in simulated domains, tuning may be prohibitively expensive on physical systems, such as legged robots, that can be damaged through extensive trial-and-error learning.In this paper, we propose a sample-efficient deep RL algorithm based on maximum entropy RL that requires minimal per-task tuning and only a modest number of trials to learn neural network policies.We apply this method to learning walking gaits on a real-world Minitaur robot.Our method can acquire a stable gait from scratch directly in the real world in about two hours, without relying on any model or simulation, and the resulting policy is robust to moderate variations in the environment.We further show that our algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance on simulated benchmarks with a single set of hyperparameters.Videos of training and the learned policy can be found on the project website 3 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15607/rss.2019.xv.011

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Application of reinforcement learning to legged locomotion has largely been confined to laboratory environments and conditions.

    “However, application of RL to legged locomotion has largely been confined to laboratory environments and conditions.”

    From Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain (2020) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J. Achiam, D. Held, A. Tamar, and P. Abbeel. Constrained policy optimization. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017.
  2. A. Iscen, K. Caluwaerts, J. Tan, T. Zhang, E. Coumans, V. Sindhwani, and V. Vanhoucke. Policies modulating trajectory generators. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL). PMLR.
  3. R. Tedrake, T. W. Zhang, and H. S. Seung. Learning to walk in 20 minutes. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Yale Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems, volume 95585, pages 1939-1412. Yale University New Haven (CT), 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haarnoja, T., Ha, S., Zhou, A., Tan, J., Tucker, G., & Levine, S.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Robotics: Science and Systems XV
Published
2019-06-22
OpenAlex
W2907537824
Cited by
430
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 14
FWCI
21.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, maximum entropy reinforcement learning, sample efficiency, legged robots, hyperparameter robustness, model-free control, policy robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review