Cited by 59Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI

Fully-convolutional deep-learning based system for coronary calcium score prediction from non-contrast chest CT

Shadmi, Ran, Mazo, Victoria, Bregman-Amitai, Orna, Elnekave, Eldad·2018·2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018)

Abstract

The amount of calcium deposits in the coronary arteries is an important biomarker of cardiovascular disease. Coronary calcium has traditionally been quantified as an Agatston score using ECG-synchronized cardiac CT. Coronary calcium is rarely quantified from general chest CT scans, of which nearly 10 Million are performed in the US annually. We present an automatic method based on fully-convolutional deep neural network to segment coronary calcium and predict Agatston score from any non-contrast chest CT. We experimented with an internal dataset acquired through partnership with a large health organization in Israel. The dataset is composed of 1054 Chest CTs and reflects a variety of originating institutions, acquisition devices and manufacturers. In comparison to expert manual annotations, our algorithm achieved a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.98. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias of 0.4 with 95% limits of agreement of [-189.9-190.7]). Our linearly weighted Kappa results are 0.89 for Agatston risk category assignment. We also applied our method on a very large (14,365 subjects) cohort from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). We demonstrate correlation of the algorithm predictions with cardiovascular-related clinical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi.2018.8363515

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies that investigated deep learning algorithms for automated coronary calcium quantification used smaller cohorts or proprietary technologies.

    “Although other studies have investigated deep learning algorithms for automated coronary calcium quantification34–42, they used smaller cohorts or proprietary technologies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shadmi, R., Mazo, V., Bregman-Amitai, O., & Elnekave, E.
Venue
2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Pages
24-28
OpenAlex
W2807121762
Cited by
59
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
FWCI
15.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, Agatston score, non-contrast chest CT, fully convolutional network, cardiovascular risk prediction, National Lung Screening Trial, calcium quantification, cardiovascular biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review