Cited by 23Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIAI in cancer detection

Coronary calcium detection using 3D attention identical dual deep network based on weakly supervised learning

Open access
Huo, Yuankai, Terry, James G., Wang, Jiachen, Nath, Vishwesh, Bermudez, Camilo, Bao, Shunxing, Parvathaneni, Prasanna, Carr, Jeffrey J. +1 more·2019·Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is biomarker of advanced subclinical coronary artery disease and predicts myocardial infarction and death prior to age 60 years. The slice-wise manual delineation has been regarded as the gold standard of coronary calcium detection. However, manual efforts are time and resource consuming and even impracticable to be applied on large-scale cohorts. In this paper, we propose the attention identical dual network (AID-Net) to perform CAC detection using scan-rescan longitudinal non-contrast CT scans with weakly supervised attention by only using per scan level labels. To leverage the performance, 3D attention mechanisms were integrated into the AID-Net to provide complementary information for classification tasks. Moreover, the 3D Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was also proposed at the testing stage to interpret the behaviors of the deep neural network. 5075 non-contrast chest CT scans were used as training, validation and testing datasets. Baseline performance was assessed on the same cohort. From the results, the proposed AID-Net achieved the superior performance on classification accuracy (0.9272) and AUC (0.9627).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2512541

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies that investigated deep learning algorithms for automated coronary calcium quantification used smaller cohorts or proprietary technologies.

    “Although other studies have investigated deep learning algorithms for automated coronary calcium quantification34–42, they used smaller cohorts or proprietary technologies.”

    From Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract identifies this as a deep-learning study of coronary artery calcium detection using 5,075 CT scans. The Methods (Experiments) say its task was detecting the presence of calcium, not predicting a quantitative Agatston score. Our copy does not establish that its cohort was smaller than the citing study’s or that it used proprietary technology. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huo, Y., Terry, J. G., Wang, J., Nath, V., Bermudez, C., Bao, S., Parvathaneni, P., Carr, J. J., & Landman, B. A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2019-03-15
Volume
10949
Pages
42
OpenAlex
W2899743512
Cited by
22
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1R01EB017230, 1452485, ULTR000445, CAREER, UL1 TR000445, UL1 RR024975-01, 2 UL1 TR000445-06)
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CDRN-1306-04869)
  • Vanderbilt University (UL1 RR024975-01, TR000445, UL1 RR024975, UL1‐TR000445, VR3029, ULTR000445, ViSE/VICTR VR3029)
  • Nvidia
  • Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VR3029, UL1 TR000445, RR024975, 2 UL1 TR000445-06, ULTR000445, UL1 RR024975-01, UL1 RR024975)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (2 UL1 TR000445-06, UL1 RR024975, ULTR000445, UL1 RR024975-01, VR3029)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1 RR024975, UL1 RR024975-01, RR024975, TR000445, ULTR000445)
  • National Institutes of Health (VR3029, ViSE/VICTR VR3029, UL1TR000445, TR000445, RR024975, ULTR000445)
  • National Eye Institute (R21EY024036)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS064534)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R03EB012461, R01EB017230)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR024975, TR000445, UL1RR024975, RR024975‐01)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (TR-000445, TR000445-06, UL‐TR‐000445)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
coronary artery disease, weakly supervised learning, non-contrast chest CT, Grad-CAM, subclinical atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review