Cited by 76IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

Secure and Personalized Edge Computing Services in 6G Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks

Hui, Yilong, Cheng, Nan, Su, Zhou, Huang, Yuanhao, Zhao, Pincan, Luan, Tom H., Li, Changle·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The customization of edge computing services is one of the key research fields in sixth-generation (6G) heterogeneous vehicular networks (HetVNETs). With various personalized requirements of vehicles on computation-intensive applications, how to explore the heterogeneous computing resources in the 6G HetVNETs to guarantee vehicles with the customized Quality of Experience (QoE), therefore, becomes a challenge. In this article, we develop a novel secure scheme to provide personalized edge computing services for moving vehicles (MVs) in 6G HetVNETs. In the scheme, a smart-contract-based secure edge computing architecture is designed by jointly considering the attack models and the characteristics of the 6G network infrastructures (e.g., satellites, drones, base stations, and roadside units), where each network infrastructure manages a number of parking vehicles to complete computing services collaboratively. With this architecture, based on the available computing resources owned by different network infrastructures, the collaborative computing resource allocation algorithm is designed to help each network infrastructure decide a customized service strategy (CSS) to satisfy the QoE of MVs. After deciding the CSSs, a model based on the second price-sealed auction is formulated to describe the competition among the network infrastructures, where the Nash equilibrium of the game is obtained to guide their optimal bidding strategies to obtain the chance for completing the services. The security analysis and the simulation results show that the proposed scheme can defend against the attacks and lead to a lower cost for completing the services than the conventional schemes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3065970

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hui, Y., Cheng, N., Su, Z., Huang, Y., Zhao, P., Luan, T. H., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Xidian University (CN)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-04-15
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
5920-5931
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3136002755
Cited by
76
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1807700)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62071356, 61901341, U1808207, 91746114)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China (XJS200109, JB210113)
  • Xi'an Science and Technology Association (095920201322)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2020JQ-301)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (D18003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
personalized services, smart contracts, moving vehicles, Nash equilibrium, bidding strategy, quality of experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review