Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Penetration-Enhanced Ultrasharp Microneedles and Prediction on Skin Interaction for Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery

Roxhed, Niclas, Gasser, T. Christian, Griss, Patrick, Holzapfel, Gerhard A., Stemme, GÖran·2007·Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems

Abstract

This paper presents penetration-enhanced hollow microneedles and an analysis on the biomechanical interaction between microneedles and skin tissue. The aim of this paper is to fabricate microneedles that reliably penetrate the skin tissue without using penetration enhancers or special insertion tools that were used in the previous studies. The microneedles are made of silicon and feature ultrasharp tips and side openings. The microneedle chips were experimentally tested in vivo by injection of dye markers. To further investigate the penetration, the insertion progression and the insertion force were monitored by measuring the electrical impedance between microneedles and a counter electrode on the skin. The microneedle design was also tested using a novel simulation approach and compared to other previously published microneedle designs. The purpose of this specific part of the paper was to investigate the interaction mechanisms between a microneedle and the skin tissue. This investigation is used to predict how the skin deforms upon insertion and how microneedles can be used to create a leak-free liquid delivery into the skin. The fabricated microneedles successfully penetrated dry living human skin at all the tested sites. The insertion characteristic of the microneedle was superior to an earlier presented type, and the insertion force of a single microneedle was estimated to be below 10 mN. This low insertion force represents a significant improvement to earlier reported results and potentially allows a microneedle array with hundreds of needles to be inserted into tissue by hand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jmems.2007.907461

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Roxhed, N., Gasser, T. C., Griss, P., Holzapfel, G. A., & Stemme, G.
Venue
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
Published
2007-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1429-1440
ISSN
1057-7157 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976553435
Cited by
199
References
2
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penetration-Enhanced Ultrasharp Microneedles and Prediction on Skin Interaction for Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jmems.2007.907461
The paper
Roxhed, N., Gasser, T. C., Griss, P., Holzapfel, G. A., & Stemme, G. (2007). Penetration-Enhanced Ultrasharp Microneedles and Prediction on Skin Interaction for Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/jmems.2007.907461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.