The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Penetration-Enhanced Ultrasharp Microneedles and Prediction on Skin Interaction for Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery
Abstract
This paper presents penetration-enhanced hollow microneedles and an analysis on the biomechanical interaction between microneedles and skin tissue. The aim of this paper is to fabricate microneedles that reliably penetrate the skin tissue without using penetration enhancers or special insertion tools that were used in the previous studies. The microneedles are made of silicon and feature ultrasharp tips and side openings. The microneedle chips were experimentally tested in vivo by injection of dye markers. To further investigate the penetration, the insertion progression and the insertion force were monitored by measuring the electrical impedance between microneedles and a counter electrode on the skin. The microneedle design was also tested using a novel simulation approach and compared to other previously published microneedle designs. The purpose of this specific part of the paper was to investigate the interaction mechanisms between a microneedle and the skin tissue. This investigation is used to predict how the skin deforms upon insertion and how microneedles can be used to create a leak-free liquid delivery into the skin. The fabricated microneedles successfully penetrated dry living human skin at all the tested sites. The insertion characteristic of the microneedle was superior to an earlier presented type, and the insertion force of a single microneedle was estimated to be below 10 mN. This low insertion force represents a significant improvement to earlier reported results and potentially allows a microneedle array with hundreds of needles to be inserted into tissue by hand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAllister, D. V., Wang, P. M., Davis, S. P., Park, J.-H., Canatella, P. J., Allen, M. G., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2331316100 · Cited by 859
Silicon micromachined hollow microneedles for transdermal liquid transport
Gardeniers, H. J. G. E., Luttge, R., Berenschot, E. J. W., de Boer, M. J., Yeshurun, S. Y., Hefetz, M., van-t Oever, R., & van den Berg, A. (2003) · Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems · doi:10.1109/jmems.2003.820293 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Larrañeta, E., Lutton, R. E. M., Woolfson, A. D., & Donnelly, R. F. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2016.03.001 · Cited by 964
Nayak, A., Babla, H., Han, T., & Das, D. B. (2016) · Drug Delivery · doi:10.3109/10717544.2014.935985 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Roxhed, N., Gasser, T. C., Griss, P., Holzapfel, G. A., & Stemme, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1429-1440
- ISSN
- 1057-7157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976553435
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penetration-Enhanced Ultrasharp Microneedles and Prediction on Skin Interaction for Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jmems.2007.907461
- The paper
- Roxhed, N., Gasser, T. C., Griss, P., Holzapfel, G. A., & Stemme, G. (2007). Penetration-Enhanced Ultrasharp Microneedles and Prediction on Skin Interaction for Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/jmems.2007.907461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.