Cited by 766Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecuritySecurity and Verification in ComputingCryptographic Implementations and Security

Hardware Trojan attacks: Threat analysis and countermeasures

Bhunia, Swarup, Hsiao, Michael S., Banga, Mainak, Narasimhan, Seetharam·2014·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

Security of a computer system has been traditionally related to the security of the software or the information being processed. The underlying hardware used for information processing has been considered trusted. The emergence of hardware Trojan attacks violates this root of trust. These attacks, in the form of malicious modifications of electronic hardware at different stages of its life cycle, pose major security concerns in the electronics industry. An adversary can mount such an attack with an objective to cause operational failure or to leak secret information from inside a chip-e.g., the key in a cryptographic chip, during field operation. Global economic trend that encourages increased reliance on untrusted entities in the hardware design and fabrication process is rapidly enhancing the vulnerability to such attacks. In this paper, we analyze the threat of hardware Trojan attacks; present attack models, types, and scenarios; discuss different forms of protection approaches, both proactive and reactive; and describe emerging attack modes, defenses, and future research pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2014.2334493

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hardware Trojan attacks require the adversary to have physical access to the integrated circuits.

    “It requires the adversary to have physical access to the integrated circuits [63,64].”
  • Hardware Trojan attacks are malicious modifications of electronic hardware at various stages of its operation and can lead to control interference and leaking of secret data.

    “Additionally, hardware Trojan attacks refer to malicious modifications of electronic hardware at various stages of its operation. These attacks are a serious security concern for the electronics industry as they can lead to control interference and the leaking of secret data.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhunia, S., Hsiao, M. S., Banga, M., & Narasimhan, S.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2014-08
Volume
102
Issue
8
Pages
1229-1247
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W1976955200
Cited by
766
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 1
FWCI
74.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF) (CNS-1054744, DUE-1245756)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Keywords
hardware Trojans, hardware security, root of trust, attack models, countermeasures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review