Cited by 641Photonic and Optical DevicesPhotorefractive and Nonlinear OpticsPhotonic Crystals and Applications

Silicon nitride in silicon photonics

Open access
Blumenthal, Daniel J., Heideman, Rene, Geuzebroek, Douwe, Leinse, Arne, Roeloffzen, Chris·2018·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

The silicon nitride (Si3N4) planar waveguide platform has enabled a broad class of low-loss planar-integrated devices and chip-scale solutions that benefit from transparency over a wide wavelength range (400-2350 nm) and fabrication using wafer-scale processes. As a complimentary platform to silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and III-V photonics, Si3N4waveguide technology opens up a new generation of system-on-chip applications not achievable with the other platforms alone. The availability of low-loss waveguides (3N4has expanded the practical application of optical signal processing functions that can reduce energy consumption, size and cost over today's digital electronic solutions. Researchers have been able to push the performance photonic-integrated components beyond other integrated platforms, including ultrahigh Q resonators, optical filters, highly coherent lasers, optical signal processing circuits, nonlinear optical devices, frequency comb generators, and biophotonic system-on-chip. This review paper covers the history of low-loss Si3N4waveguide technology and a survey of worldwide research in a variety of device and applications as well as the status of Si3N4foundries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2018.2861576

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other material platforms have been developed to further extend the capabilities beyond what silicon can offer, including III-V semiconductors, lithium niobate (LN), silicon carbide (SiC), nitrides, diamond, and tantalum pentoxide (Ta 2 O 5 ).

    “While silicon-based photonics has been the workhorse for QPICs owing to the low waveguide loss and the existing foundry infrastructure, other material platforms have been developed to further extend the capabilities beyond what silicon can offer [13], including III-V semiconductors, lithium niobate (LN), silicon carbide (SiC), nitrides, diamond, and tantalum pentoxide (Ta 2 O 5 ).”

    From 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction (page not available in our copy) identifies III-V photonics and silicon nitride as platforms with capabilities complementary to silicon photonics. It does not substantiate the sentence’s additional examples—lithium niobate, silicon carbide, diamond, and tantalum pentoxide—as developed alternative platforms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Silicon-based photonics has been the workhorse for QPICs owing to the low waveguide loss and the existing foundry infrastructure.

    “While silicon-based photonics has been the workhorse for QPICs owing to the low waveguide loss and the existing foundry infrastructure, other material platforms have been developed to further extend the capabilities beyond what silicon can offer [13], including III-V semiconductors, lithium niobate (LN), silicon carbide (SiC), nitrides, diamond, and tantalum pentoxide (Ta 2 O 5 ).”

    From 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says silicon-on-insulator photonics benefits from established CMOS infrastructure and has moderate waveguide losses. It lists quantum communication as a PIC application, but does not establish that silicon-based photonics has been the workhorse for quantum photonic integrated circuits or that low waveguide loss is the reason; it describes silicon nitride as offering lower-loss waveguides. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [23]23. C. H. Henry, R. F. Kazarinov, H. J. Lee, K. J. Orlowsky, and L. E. Katz, "Low loss Si3N4-SiO2 optical waveguides on Si," Appl. Opt., vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2621-2624, 1987.
  2. [37]37. M.-C. Tien, J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, D. J. Blumenthal, and J. E. Bowers, "Ultra-low loss Si3N4 waveguides with low nonlinearity and high power handling capability," Opt. Express, vol. 18, no. 23, pp. 23562-23568, 2010.
  3. [55]55. J. F. Bauters et al., "Ultra-low-loss high-aspect-ratio Si3N4 waveguides," Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3163-3174, 2011.
  4. [57]57. D. T. Spencer, J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, and J. E. Bowers, "Integrated waveguide coupled Si3N4 resonators in the ultrahigh-Q regime," Optica, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 153-157, 2014.
  5. [58]58. L. Zhuang, D. Marpaung, M. Burla, W. Beeker, A. Leinse, and C. Roeloffzen, "Low-loss, high-index-contrast Si3N4/SiO2 optical waveguides for optical delay lines in microwave photonics signal processing," Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 23162-23170, 2011.
  6. [68]68. M. Belt et al., "Sidewall gratings in ultra-low-loss Si3N4 planar waveguides," Opt. Express, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1181-1188, 2013.
  7. [128]128. M. Boerkamp et al., "On-chip optical trapping and Raman spectroscopy using a TripleX dual-waveguide trap," Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 25, pp. 30528-30537, Dec. 2014.
  8. [129]129. A. Leinse et al., "TriPleX waveguide platform: Low-loss technology over a wide wavelength range," Proc. SPIE, vol. 8767, p. 87670E, May 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blumenthal, D. J., Heideman, R., Geuzebroek, D., Leinse, A., & Roeloffzen, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • LioniX (Netherlands) (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2018-12
Volume
106
Issue
12
Pages
2209-2231
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W2894308888
Cited by
641
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 2
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DoD-N W911NF-04-9-0001 iPhoD HR0011-09-C-01233, EPHI HR0011-12-C-0006, iWOG HR0011-14-C-0111, PRIGM:AIMS N66001-16-C-4017)
  • Keysight Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
Keywords
silicon nitride, silicon photonics, planar waveguides, low-loss waveguides, photonic integrated circuits, system-on-chip, optical signal processing, high-Q resonators, optical filters, frequency combs, nonlinear optical devices, biophotonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review