The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transmitter and Receiver Architectures for Molecular Communications: A Survey on Physical Design With Modulation, Coding, and Detection Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Inspired by nature, molecular communications (MC), i.e., the use of molecules to encode, transmit, and receive information, stands as the most promising communication paradigm to realize the nanonetworks. Even though there has been extensive theoretical research toward nanoscale MC, there are no examples of implemented nanoscale MC networks. The main reason for this lies in the peculiarities of nanoscale physics, challenges in nanoscale fabrication, and highly stochastic nature of the biochemical domain of envisioned nanonetwork applications. This mandates developing novel device architectures and communication methods compatible with MC constraints. To that end, various transmitter and receiver designs for MC have been proposed in the literature together with numerable modulation, coding, and detection techniques. However, these works fall into domains of a very wide spectrum of disciplines, including, but not limited to, information and communication theory, quantum physics, materials science, nanofabrication, physiology, and synthetic biology. Therefore, we believe it is imperative for the progress of the field that an organized exposition of cumulative knowledge on the subject matter can be compiled. Thus, to fill this gap, in this comprehensive survey, we review the existing literature on transmitter and receiver architectures toward realizing MC among nanomaterial-based nanomachines and/or biological entities and provide a complete overview of modulation, coding, and detection techniques employed for MC. Moreover, we identify the most significant shortcomings and challenges in all these research areas and propose potential solutions to overcome some of them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095833 · Cited by 4,552
Clapham, D. E. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028 · Cited by 4,175
Electrochemical Glucose Biosensors
Wang, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068123a · Cited by 3,498
Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect
Castro, E. V., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Peres, N. M. R., dos Santos, J. M. B. L., Nilsson, J., Guinea, F., Geim, A. K., & Neto, A. H. C. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.216802 · Cited by 2,033
The rise of plastic bioelectronics
Someya, T., Bao, Z., & Malliaras, G. G. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21004 · Cited by 1,884
Sharifi, S., Behzadi, S., Laurent, S., Laird Forrest, M., Stroeve, P., & Mahmoudi, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15188f · Cited by 1,460
Dunbar, C. E., High, K. A., Joung, J. K., Kohn, D. B., Ozawa, K., & Sadelain, M. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan4672 · Cited by 1,410
Random access in large-scale DNA data storage
Organick, L., Ang, S. D., Chen, Y.-J., Lopez, R., Yekhanin, S., Makarychev, K., Racz, M. Z., Kamath, G., Gopalan, P., Nguyen, B., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4079 · Cited by 775
Engineering bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic applications
Riglar, D. T., & Silver, P. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.172 · Cited by 460
Cited by
Survey on 6G Frontiers: Trends, Applications, Requirements, Technologies and Future Research
Alwis, C. D., Kalla, A., Pham, Q.-V., Kumar, P., Dev, K., Hwang, W.-J., & Liyanage, M. (2021) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2021.3071496 · Cited by 788
Two-Dimensional Field-Effect Transistor Sensors: The Road toward Commercialization
Dai, C., Liu, Y., & Wei, D. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00924 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuscu, M., Dinc, E., Bilgin, B. A., Ramezani, H., & Akan, O. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1302-1341
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2908925932
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transmitter and Receiver Architectures for Molecular Communications: A Survey on Physical Design With Modulation, Coding, and Detection Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2019.2916081
- The paper
- Kuscu, M., Dinc, E., Bilgin, B. A., Ramezani, H., & Akan, O. B. (2019). Transmitter and Receiver Architectures for Molecular Communications: A Survey on Physical Design With Modulation, Coding, and Detection Techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2916081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.