Cited by 46Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignLow-power high-performance VLSI design

Physical random number generator based on MOS structure after soft breakdown

Open access
Yasuda, S., Satake, H., Tanamoto, T., Ohba, R., Uchida, K., Fujita, S.·2004·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

We present a novel physical random number generator (RNG) that uses a metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) capacitor after soft breakdown (SBD) as a random source. It is known that the electrical properties of MOS capacitors after SBD show large fluctuation. When the resistor in an astable multivibrator is replaced with an MOS capacitor after SBD, the multivibrator converts the noise signal into a rectangular wave whose period fluctuates randomly. A 1-bit counter and a flip-flop are used to generate random numbers from the fluctuating rectangular wave. Some high-level tests indicate that the generated random numbers have excellent quality for cryptographic applications. Even though our circuit is small and can be constructed using about 20 complementary-MOS logic gates and several passive devices, high-quality random numbers such as those generated by large physical RNGs can be obtained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2004.831480

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All prior true random number generators have suffered from drawbacks in scalability, circuit complexity, or reliance on post-processing such as a Von Neumann corrector to remove bias.

    “However, all prior TRNGs have suffered from drawbacks in scalability, circuit complexity, or relied on post-processing such as a “Von Neumann corrector” to remove bias from the generated bit sequences4–13.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yasuda, S., Satake, H., Tanamoto, T., Ohba, R., Uchida, K., & Fujita, S.
Affiliations
Toshiba (Japan) (JP)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2004-08
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1375-1377
ISSN
0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031590600
Cited by
46
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
physical random number generators, MOS capacitors, soft breakdown, astable multivibrator, random number quality, cryptographic applications, CMOS circuit design, flip-flops

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review