Cited by 150Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

SpEED-QA: Spatial Efficient Entropic Differencing for Image and Video Quality

Bampis, Christos G., Gupta, Praful, Soundararajan, Rajiv, Bovik, Alan C.·2017·IEEE Signal Processing Letters

Abstract

Many image and video quality assessment (I/VQA) models rely on data transformations of image/video frames, which increases their programming and computational complexity. By comparison, some of the most popular I/VQA models deploy simple spatial bandpass operations at a couple of scales, making them attractive for efficient implementation. Here we design reduced-reference image and video quality models of this type that are derived from the high-performance reduced reference entropic differencing (RRED) I/VQA models. A new family of I/VQA models, which we call the spatial efficient entropic differencing for quality assessment (SpEED-QA) model, relies on local spatial operations on image frames and frame differences to compute perceptually relevant image/video quality features in an efficient way. Software for SpEED-QA is available at: http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/Quality/SpEED_Demo.zip.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lsp.2017.2726542

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bampis, C. G., Gupta, P., Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Published
2017-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1333-1337
ISSN
  • 1070-9908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2361
OpenAlex
W2735448770
Cited by
150
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Signal Processing Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image quality assessment, video quality assessment, frame difference, efficient implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review