Cited by 19Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationMemory and Neural MechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

Multimodal representation learning for place recognition using deep Hebbian predictive coding

Open access
Pearson, Martin J., Dora, Shirin, Struckmeier, Oliver, Knowles, Thomas C., Mitchinson, Ben, Tiwari, Kshitij, Kyrki, Ville, Bohte, Sander +1 more·2021·Frontiers in Robotics and AI

Abstract

Recognising familiar places is a competence required in many engineering applications that interact with the real world such as robot navigation. Combining information from different sensory sources promotes robustness and accuracy of place recognition. However, mismatch in data registration, dimensionality, and timing between modalities remain challenging problems in multisensory place recognition. Spurious data generated by sensor drop-out in multisensory environments is particularly problematic and often resolved through adhoc and brittle solutions. An effective approach to these problems is demonstrated by animals as they gracefully move through the world. Therefore, we take a neuro-ethological approach by adopting self-supervised representation learning based on a neuroscientific model of visual cortex known as predictive coding. We demonstrate how this parsimonious network algorithm which is trained using a local learning rule can be extended to combine visual and tactile sensory cues from a biomimetic robot as it naturally explores a visually aliased environment. The place recognition performance obtained using joint latent representations generated by the network is significantly better than contemporary representation learning techniques. Further, we see evidence of improved robustness at place recognition in face of unimodal sensor drop-out. The proposed multimodal deep predictive coding algorithm presented is also linearly extensible to accommodate more than two sensory modalities, thereby providing an intriguing example of the value of neuro-biologically plausible representation learning for multimodal navigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/frobt.2021.732023

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effectiveness of multisensory integration in predictive coding driving place recognition in mobile rodent-like robots exemplifies how this approach may help to define so-called 'indicators of consciousness' in artificial agents.

    “For instance, the effectiveness of multisensory integration in predictive coding driving place recognition in mobile rodent-like robots (Pearson et al., 2021) exemplifies how this approach may help to define socalled 'indicators of consciousness' in artificial agents (Lee & Pennartz, 2025; Pennartz et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Flach P. Kull M. (2015). “ Precision-recall-gain Curves: Pr Analysis Done Right,”. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Editors Cortes C. Lawrence N. Lee D. Sugiyama M. Garnett R. (Redhook: Curran Associates, Inc.), 28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, M. J., Dora, S., Struckmeier, O., Knowles, T. C., Mitchinson, B., Tiwari, K., Kyrki, V., Bohte, S., & Pennartz, C. M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (NL)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Martin J.
Venue
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Published
2021-12-13
Volume
8
Pages
732023-732023
ISSN
2296-9144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200396728
Cited by
19
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (945539)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
place recognition, predictive coding, Hebbian learning, multimodal representation learning, multisensory integration, visual-tactile fusion, self-supervised learning, visual cortex model, latent representations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review