Cited by 15Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Causal Learning for Socially Responsible AI

Open access
Cheng, Lu, Mosallanezhad, Ahmadreza, Sheth, Paras, Liu, Huan·2021·Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

There have been increasing concerns about Artificial Intelligence (AI) due to its unfathomable potential power. To make AI address ethical challenges and shun undesirable outcomes, researchers proposed to develop socially responsible AI (SRAI). One of these approaches is causal learning (CL). We survey state-of-the-art methods of CL for SRAI. We begin by examining the seven CL tools to enhance the social responsibility of AI, then review how existing works have succeeded using these tools to tackle issues in developing SRAI such as fairness. The goal of this survey is to bring forefront the potentials and promises of CL for SRAI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2021/598

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aditya Chattopadhyay, Piyushi Manupriya, Anirban Sarkar, and Vineeth N Balasubrama- nian. Neural network attributions: A causal perspective. In ICML, pages 981-990. PMLR, 2019.
  2. Choe et al., 2020] Yo Joong Choe, Jiyeon Ham, and Kyuby- ong Park. An empirical study of invariant risk minimiza- tion. In ICML UDL, 2020.
  3. Mohan and Pearl, 2021] Karthika Mohan and Judea Pearl. Graphical models for processing missing data. JASA, pages 1-42, 2021.
  4. Pearl and Bareinboim, 2011] Judea Pearl and Elias Barein- boim. Transportability of causal and statistical relations: A formal approach. In AAAI, volume 25, 2011.
  5. Pearl, 2019] Judea Pearl. The seven tools of causal infer- ence, with reflections on machine learning. Communica- tions of the ACM, 62(3):54-60, 2019.
  6. Peters et al., 2016] Jonas Peters, Peter Bühlmann, and Nicolai Meinshausen. Causal inference by using invari- ant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol, pages 947-1012, 2016.
  7. Silviu Pitis, Elliot Creager, and Animesh Garg. Counterfactual data augmentation using locally fac- tored dynamics. In NeurIPS, 2020.
  8. Longqi Yang, Yin Cui, Yuan Xuan, Chenyang Wang, Serge Belongie, and Deborah Estrin. Un- biased offline recommender evaluation for missing-not-at- random implicit feedback. In RecSys, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, L., Mosallanezhad, A., Sheth, P., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2021-08
Pages
4374-4381
OpenAlex
W3190201191
Cited by
15
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1909555)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF2020124, W911NF2110030)
  • Army Research Laboratory (W911NF2020124, W911NF2110030)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
causal learning, AI ethics, fairness, causal inference, algorithmic fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review