Cited by 41Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlECG Monitoring and Analysis

Design, development and clinical validation of a wrist-based optical heart rate monitor

Preejith, S P, Alex, Annamol, Joseph, Jayaraj, Sivaprakasam, Mohanasankar·2016·2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)

Abstract

Development in the field of sensor technology, hardware miniaturization, ubiquitous computing and connected solutions paved the way for the development of wearables for continuous physiological parameter monitoring. Continuous heart rate monitoring with clinical accuracy using reflectance photoplethysmogram signals from wrist is highly challenging and presents a potential area of research. In this work, we present a wearable device in a wrist watch form factor for heart rate monitoring. The device runs on a low power ARM cortex M4 microcontroller and integrates a BLE (Bluetooth Low energy) module for wireless connectivity. A heart rate computation algorithm using reflectance photoplethysmography and a 3 axes accelerometer for motion artifact removal is presented in the paper. Heart rate computed by the wrist worn device was validated against heart rate measured using Masimo Radical-7 on 256 subjects. The validation study was conducted in a hospital setting for a duration of 1 month, after obtaining the ethics committee approval and informed consent from the subjects. Details of the experimental setup, clinical validation protocol and observations and inferences made from the study are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/memea.2016.7533786

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preejith et al.'s device had an error of 1.04 BPM for 'fair' skinned individuals and 10.90 BPM for 'dark' skinned participants, a greater than 10 times increase in absolute error.

    “There was an error of 1.04 beats per minute (BPM) for “fair” skinned individuals and an error of 10.90 BPM for “dark” skinned participants, citing the lack of usability of their device for dark skinned individuals.”
  • Preejith et al. found a significant direct correlation between SNR of heart rate and skin tone using a 535 nm LED, indicating that a darker skin tone yields higher error in the measurement.

    “Preejith et al. confirmed that skin tone matters when using green light only. The analysis of their PPG biosensor (single source 535 nm LED) showed a significant direct correlation SNR of the heart rate with skin tone, indicating that a darker skin tone yields higher error in the measurement [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preejith, S. P., Alex, A., Joseph, J., & Sivaprakasam, M.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-05
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2511765933
Cited by
41
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
wearable sensors, motion artifact removal, accelerometer, Bluetooth Low Energy, ARM Cortex-M4, clinical validation, continuous physiological monitoring, low-power embedded systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review