Cited by 39Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlECG Monitoring and Analysis

Robust heart rate estimation using wrist-based PPG signals in the presence of intense physical activities

Zong, Chengzhi, Jafari, Roozbeh·2015·2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

Heart rate tracking from a wrist-type photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal during intensive physical activities is a challenge that is attracting more attention thanks to the introduction of wrist-worn wearable computers. Commonly-used motion artifact rejection methods coupled with simple periodicity-based heart rate estimation techniques are incapable of achieving satisfactory heart rate tracking performance during intense activities. In this paper, we propose a two-stage solution. Firstly, we introduce an improved spectral subtraction method to reject the spectral components of motion artifacts. Secondly, instead of using heuristic mechanisms, we formalize the spectral peaks selection process as the shortest path search problem and validate its effectiveness. Analysis on the experimental results based on a published database shows that: (1) Our proposed method outperforms three other comparable methods with regards to heart rate estimation error. (2) The proposed method is a promising candidate for both offline cardiac health analysis and online heart rate tracking in daily life, even during intensive physical motions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2015.7320268

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heart rate measurements from wearable devices are often less accurate during physical activity or cyclic wrist motions.

    “Several studies have demonstrated that HR measurements from wearable devices are often less accurate during physical activity or cyclic wrist motions.”
  • Wearable devices have higher error during activity than at rest.

    “Our analyses reinforces the growing body of research demonstrating that wearable devices have higher error during activity than at rest.8,11,35,38,39”
  • All these motions range between 0.1 and 20 Hz, which is within the frequency range for heart rate (1-4 Hz).

    “All these motions range between 0.1 and 20 Hz, which is within the frequency range for heart rate (1–4 Hz) [163].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zong, C., & Jafari, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-08
Volume
2015
Pages
8078-8082
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294523693
Cited by
39
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
heart rate estimation, photoplethysmography, wrist-worn sensors, motion artifact rejection, spectral subtraction, shortest path search, wearable devices, physical activity, cardiac health monitoring
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Heart Rate, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Wrist, Exercise, Artifacts, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review