Cited by 155Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

A Review of Wearable Multi-Wavelength Photoplethysmography

Open access
Ray, Daniel, Collins, Tim, Woolley, Sandra, Ponnapalli, Prasad·2023·IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Optical pulse detection 'photoplethysmography' (PPG) provides a means of low cost and unobtrusive physiological monitoring that is popular in many wearable devices. However, the accuracy, robustness and generalizability of single-wavelength PPG sensing are sensitive to biological characteristics as well as sensor configuration and placement; this is significant given the increasing adoption of single-wavelength wrist-worn PPG devices in clinical studies and healthcare. Since different wavelengths interact with the skin to varying degrees, researchers have explored the use of multi-wavelength PPG to improve sensing accuracy, robustness and generalizability. This paper contributes a novel and comprehensive state-of-the-art review of wearable multi-wavelength PPG sensing, encompassing motion artifact reduction and estimation of physiological parameters. The paper also encompasses theoretical details about multi-wavelength PPG sensing and the effects of biological characteristics. The review findings highlight the promising developments in motion artifact reduction using multi-wavelength approaches, the effects of skin temperature on PPG sensing, the need for improved diversity in PPG sensing studies and the lack of studies that investigate the combined effects of factors. Recommendations are made for the standardization and completeness of reporting in terms of study design, sensing technology and participant characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/rbme.2021.3121476

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, D., Collins, T., Woolley, S., & Ponnapalli, P.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Keele University (GB)
Venue
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2023
Volume
16
Pages
136-151
ISSN
  • 1937-3333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1189
OpenAlex
W3205108302
Cited by
155
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 13
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
photoplethysmography, multi-wavelength PPG, wearable sensors, motion artifact reduction, physiological parameter estimation, sensor placement, physiological monitoring, wrist-worn devices, standardized reporting
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Algorithms, Heart Rate, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Wrist, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review