Cited by 20Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Experimental validation of dual PPG local pulse wave velocity probe

Nabeel PM., Karthik, Srinivasa, Joseph, Jayaraj, Sivaprakasam, Mohanasankar·2017·2017 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)

Abstract

A novel dual photoplethysmograph (PPG) probe and measurement system for local pulse wave velocity (PWV) is proposed and demonstrated. The developed probe design employs reflectance PPG transducers for non-invasive detection of blood pulse propagation waveforms from two adjacent measurement points (28 mm apart). Transit time delay between the continuously acquired dual pulse waveform was used for beat-to-beat local PWV measurement. An in-vivo experimental validation study was conducted on 10 healthy volunteers (8 male and 2 female, 21 to 33 years of age) to validate the PPG probe design and developed local PWV measurement system. The proposed system was able to measure carotid local PWV from multiple subjects. Beat-to-beat variation of baseline carotid PWV was less than 7.5% for 7 out of 10 subjects, a maximum beat-to-beat variation of 16% was observed during the study. Variation in beat-to-beat carotid local PWV and brachial blood pressure (BP) values during post-exercise recovery period was also examined. A statistically significant correlation between intra-subject local PWV variation and brachial BP parameters was observed (r > 0.85, p <; 0.001). The results demonstrated the feasibility of proposed PPG probe for continuous beat-to-beat local PWV measurement from the carotid artery. Such a non-invasive local PWV measurement unit can be potentially used for continuous ambulatory BP measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/memea.2017.7985911

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTT, used to determine PWV and estimate blood pressure without a cuff, requires extraction of the time delay from two PPG waveforms or from an ECG and PPG waveform.

    “Additionally, some parameters in the literature such as pulse transit time (PTT), which is used to determine pulse wave velocity (PWV) and estimate blood pressure without a cuff, requires extraction of the time delay from two PPG waveforms or from an ECG and PPG waveform [31,32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nabeel, P. M., Karthik, S., Joseph, J., & Sivaprakasam, M.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
408-413
OpenAlex
W2736855906
Cited by
20
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
pulse wave velocity, photoplethysmography, carotid artery, brachial blood pressure, post-exercise recovery, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review