Cited by 35Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesAdvanced Power Amplifier Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 75–116-GHz LNA with 23-K noise temperature at 108 GHz

Abstract

In this paper we present the design and measurement results, both on-wafer and in package, of an ultra-low-noise and wideband monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) amplifier in the frequency range of 75 to 116 GHz. The three-stage amplifier packaged in a WR10 waveguide housing and fabricated using a 35-nm InP HEMT technology achieves a record noise temperature of 23 K at 108 GHz when cryogenically cooled to 27 K. The measured gain is 22 to 27 dB for frequency range of 75 to 116 GHz. Furthermore, the amplifier utilizes four-finger devices with a total gate width of 60 μm resulting in higher output power. Therefore, we consider that this amplifier achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of bandwidth, noise temperature, gain, and linearity so far reported for cryogenically cooled amplifiers around W-band.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mwsym.2013.6697595

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • III-V direct band gap semiconductor devices like Ga-As based pHEMTs are one of the most preferred choices for developing cryogenic amplifiers.

    “whereas III-V direct band gap semiconductor devices like Ga-As based pHEMTs are one of the most preferred choice for developing cryogenic amplifiers [12-28].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. pospieszalski, 1991, HFET'S and receivers for the millimeterwave array, National Radio Astronomy Observatory Millimeter Array Memo

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Varonen, M., Reeves, R., Kangaslahti, P., Samoska, L., Akgiray, A., Cleary, K., Gawande, R., Fung, A., Gaier, T., Weinreb, S., Readhead, A. C. S., Lawrence, C., Sarkozy, S., & Lai, R.
Affiliations
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Northrop Grumman (United States) (US)
Venue
2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-06
Pages
1-3
ISSN
0149-645X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144351743
Cited by
35
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digest (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Oak Ridge Associated Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave Engineering and Waveguides
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Power Amplifier Design
Keywords
low noise amplifier, W-band, noise temperature, InP HEMT, cryogenic cooling, monolithic microwave integrated circuits, wideband amplifier

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review