The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review
Abstract
Recent demand and interest in wireless, mobile-based healthcare has driven significant interest towards developing alternative biopotential electrodes for patient physiological monitoring. The conventional wet adhesive Ag/AgCl electrodes used almost universally in clinical applications today provide an excellent signal but are cumbersome and irritating for mobile use. While electrodes that operate without gels, adhesives and even skin contact have been known for many decades, they have yet to achieve any acceptance for medical use. In addition, detailed knowledge and comparisons between different electrodes are not well known in the literature. In this paper, we explore the use of dry/noncontact electrodes for clinical use by first explaining the electrical models for dry, insulated and noncontact electrodes and show the performance limits, along with measured data. The theory and data show that the common practice of minimizing electrode resistance may not always be necessary and actually lead to increased noise depending on coupling capacitance. Theoretical analysis is followed by an extensive review of the latest dry electrode developments in the literature. The paper concludes with highlighting some of the novel systems that dry electrode technology has enabled for cardiac and neural monitoring followed by a discussion of the current challenges and a roadmap going forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wearable Medical Systems for p-Health
Teng, X.-F., Zhang, Y.-T., Poon, C. C. Y., & Bonato, P. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008248 · Cited by 310
Novel dry electrodes for ECG monitoring
Gruetzmann, A., Hansen, S., & Müller, J. (2007) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/005 · Cited by 248
Smart Jacket Design for Neonatal Monitoring with Wearable Sensors
Bouwstra, S., Chen, W., Feijs, L., & Oetomo, S. B. (2009) · 2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks · doi:10.1109/bsn.2009.40 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Wearable sensors: modalities, challenges, and prospects
Heikenfeld, J., Jajack, A., Rogers, J., Gutruf, P., Tian, L., Pan, T., Li, R., Khine, M., Kim, J., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00914c · Cited by 1,434
Monitoring of Vital Signs with Flexible and Wearable Medical Devices
Khan, Y., Ostfeld, A. E., Lochner, C. M., Pierre, A., & Arias, A. C. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504366 · Cited by 1,408
Bio-Integrated Wearable Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Ray, T. R., Choi, J., Bandodkar, A. J., Krishnan, S., Gutruf, P., Tian, L., Ghaffari, R., & Rogers, J. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573 · Cited by 1,350
Smart Homes that Monitor Breathing and Heart Rate
Adib, F., Mao, H., Kabelac, Z., Katabi, D., & Miller, R. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702200 · Cited by 916
Flexible and Stretchable Electronics for Biointegrated Devices
Kim, D.-H., Ghaffari, R., Lu, N., & Rogers, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150018 · Cited by 749
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, Y. M., Jung, T.-P., & Cauwenberghs, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 106-119
- ISSN
- 1937-3333 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-1189
- OpenAlex
- W2126390573
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/rbme.2010.2084078
- The paper
- Chi, Y. M., Jung, T.-P., & Cauwenberghs, G. (2010). Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2010.2084078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.