Cited by 34RFID technology advancementsAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityCryptographic Implementations and Security

Reverse engineering the communications protocol of an RFID public transportation card

Fraga-Lamas, Paula, Fernandez-Carames, Tiago M.·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID)

Abstract

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) security has not been properly handled in numerous applications, such as in public transportation systems. In this paper, a methodology to reverse engineer and detect security flaws is put into practice. Specifically, the communications protocol of an ISO/IEC 14443-B public transportation card used by hundreds of thousands of people in Spain was analyzed. By applying the methodology with a hardware tool (Proxmark 3), it was possible to access private information (e.g. trips performed, buses taken, fares applied...), to capture tag-reader communications, and even emulate both tags and readers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/rfid.2017.7945583

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a result of the combination of the latest advances in electronics, networking, and robotics, it is feasible to develop advanced sensor systems for different sectors and applications: energy efficiency, Industry 4.0, home automation, public safety and defense, precision agriculture or transportation.

    “As a result of the combination of the latest advances in electronics, networking, and robotics, it is feasible to develop advanced sensor systems for different sectors and applications: energy efficiency [32], Industry 4.0 [33,34], home automation [35], public safety and defense [36,37], precision agriculture [38] or transportation [39].”
  • Several smart cards used in public transportation present faults.

    “considering that several smart cards used in public transportation present faults [39,40]”
  • The most common reason to justify blockchain is the lack of trust in the organization that manages the infrastructure or some privacy requirements specified by a client.

    “The most common reason is the lack of trust in the organization that manages the infrastructure or some privacy requirements specified by a client [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraga-Lamas, P., & Fernandez-Carames, T. M.
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
30-35
ISSN
2374-0221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625973858
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on RFID (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › RFID technology advancements
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Keywords
RFID security, reader-tag communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review