The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the effects of robot behavior and attitude towards technology on social human-robot interactions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, attitudes toward robots could be different than attitudes toward autonomous agents embedded in a computer, yet attitudes play a role in interactions and communication (e.g., Nitsch & Glassen, 2015; Powers et al., 2007).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Nitsch & Glassen, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
When Social Outcomes Aren′t Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences
Blount, S. (1995) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1068 · Cited by 814
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICHR.2006.321322 · DOI · Paper page
- sanfey, 2003, The neural basis of economic decision-making in the UG, Science, 300, 1755, 10.1126/science.1082976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 · DOI · Paper page
- nishio, 2012, Do robot appearance and speech affect people's attitude? Evaluation through the UG, Proc IEEE Int Symp Robot Human Interactive Commun
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x · DOI · Paper page
- karrer, 2009, Technikaffinitat erfassen-der Fragebogen TA-EG, VDI, 196
- 10.1007/BF02425259 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/jep.9.2.209 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1014396 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1024/0044-3514.37.4.219 · DOI
Cited by
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Chugunova, M., & Sele, D. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101897 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Nitsch, V., & Glassen, T.
- Venue
- 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-08
- Pages
- 535-540
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
