Cited by 1,433Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpeech and dialogue systems

Multimodal Language Analysis in the Wild: CMU-MOSEI Dataset and Interpretable Dynamic Fusion Graph

Open access
Bagher Zadeh, AmirAli, Liang, Paul Pu, Poria, Soujanya, Cambria, Erik, Morency, Louis-Philippe·2018·Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

AmirAli Bagher Zadeh, Paul Pu Liang, Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, Louis-Philippe Morency. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p18-1208

Cites

62 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CMU-MOSEI encompasses 3837 videos collected from over 1000 distinctive YouTube speakers, with a gender distribution of 57% male and 43% female speakers.

    “This dataset encompasses 3837 videos collected from over 1000 distinctive YouTube speakers, with a reasonably balanced gender distribution of 57% male and 43% female speakers, highlighting the dataset’s focus on inclusivity.”

    From A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Speech, Text, and Face (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    Section 3.1 (Data Acquisition; page unavailable) reports 3,228 videos after quality inspection, not 3,837, and identifies 1,000 YouTube identities rather than over 1,000 distinct speakers. It does report a 57% male to 43% female gender balance, based on judges’ annotations of the videos. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CMU-MOSEI thematic diversity is spread across 250 different themes, with three predominant themes: comments (16.2%), debates (2.9%), and consultations (1.8%).

    “The thematic diversity of the CMU-MOSEI dataset is notable, with a spread across 250 different themes. The three predominant themes are comments (16.2%), debates (2.9%), and consultations (1.8%), while the rest of the themes are nearly evenly distributed.”

    From A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Speech, Text, and Face (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The paper’s “Variety in annotations” section says CMU-MOSEI spans 250 topics. Section 3.1 (Data Acquisition) gives the same percentages and says the remaining topics are almost uniformly distributed, but names the leading topic as reviews (16.2%), not comments. It calls the other two debate (2.9%) and consulting (1.8%). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CMU-MOSEI has annotations at the utterance level, with 23,259 samples annotated in this manner.

    “One of CMU-MOSEI’s unique characteristics is its annotations at the utterance level, with 23,259 samples annotated in this manner.”

    From A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Emotion Recognition: Speech, Text, and Face (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    Section 3.2 (Annotation; page not available) says each sentence is annotated, supporting sentence-level annotations. But the dataset description and Table 1 report 23,453 annotated segments or data points, not 23,259; the cited paper also does not call them utterances. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CMU-MOSEI is a crucial resource in multimodal sentiment analysis and emotion recognition, distinguished by its scale, which is unmatched in the field.

    “The CMU Multimodal Opinion Sentiment and Emotion Intensity (CMU-MOSEI) dataset [30] is a crucial resource in multimodal sentiment analysis and emotion recognition, distinguished by its scale, which is unmatched in the field.”
  • The authors generated open-ended AQAs about speech using the four datasets IEMOCAP, MOSEI, LibriTTS, and VoxCeleb2.

    “We generate open-ended AQAs about speech using the four commonly used datasets IEMOCAP [23], MOSEI [24], LibriTTS [25], and Vox-Celeb2 [26,27].”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gilles Degottex, John Kane, Thomas Drugman, Tuomo Raitio, and Stefan Scherer. 2014. Covarep-a col- laborative voice analysis repository for speech tech- nologies. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pages 960-964.
  2. Devamanyu Hazarika, Soujanya Poria, Amir Zadeh, Erik Cambria, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Roger Zimmerman. 2018. Memn: Multimodal emotional memory network for emotion recognition in dyadic conversational videos. In NAACL.
  3. Julian Georg Zilly, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, Jan Koutník, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 2016. Re- current Highway Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.03474 . · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagher Zadeh, A., Liang, P. P., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Morency, L.-P.
Affiliations
  • California Miramar University (US)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Venue
Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2018
Pages
2236-2246
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883409523
Cited by
1,433
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 281 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 266 · 2023: 202 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 6
FWCI
17.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
CMU-MOSEI, multimodal fusion, emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review