The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feedback Analysis and Design of RF Power Links for Low-Power Bionic Systems
Abstract
This paper presents a feedback-loop technique for analyzing and designing RF power links for transcutaneous bionic systems, i.e., between an external RF coil and an internal RF coil implanted inside the body. The feedback techniques shed geometric insight into link design and minimize algebraic manipulations. We demonstrate that when the loop transmission of the link's feedback loop is -1, the link is critically coupled, i.e., the magnitude of the voltage transfer function across the link is maximal. We also derive an optimal loading condition that maximizes the energy efficiency of the link and use it as a basis for our link design. We present an example of a bionic implant system designed for load power consumptions in the 1-10-mW range, a low-power regime not significantly explored in prior designs. Such low power levels add to the challenge of link efficiency, because the overhead associated with switching losses in power amplifiers at the link input and with rectifiers at the link output significantly degrade link efficiency. We describe a novel integrated Class-E power amplifier design that uses a simple control strategy to minimize such losses. At 10-mW load power consumption, we measure overall link efficiencies of 74% and 54% at 1- and 10-mm coil separations, respectively, in good agreement with our theoretical predictions of the link's efficiency. At 1-mW load power consumption, we measure link efficiencies of 67% and 51% at 1- and 10-mm coil separations, respectively, also in good accord with our theoretical predictions. In both cases, the link's rectified output dc voltage varied by less than 16% over link distances that ranged from 2 to 10 mm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation
Zeng, F.-G., Rebscher, S., Harrison, W., Sun, X., & Feng, H. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008250 · Cited by 878
Optimal Frequency for Wireless Power Transmission Into Dispersive Tissue
Poon, A. S. Y., O'Driscoll, S., & Meng, T. H. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.2010.2044310 · Cited by 469
Modeling and optimization of printed spiral coils in air, saline, and muscle tissue environments
Jow, U.-M., & Ghovanloo, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2009.2025366 · Cited by 241
A Figure-of-Merit for Designing High-Performance Inductive Power Transmission Links
Kiani, M., & Ghovanloo, M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2227914 · Cited by 146
Wireless power transfer: systems, circuits, standards, and use cases
Van Mulders, J., Delabie, D., Lecluyse, C., Buyle, C., Callebaut, G., Van der Perre, L., & De Strycker, L. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22155573 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, M. W., & Sarpeshkar, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-38
- ISSN
- 1932-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9990
- OpenAlex
- W2158019432
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feedback Analysis and Design of RF Power Links for Low-Power Bionic Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbcas.2007.893180
- The paper
- Baker, M. W., & Sarpeshkar, R. (2007). Feedback Analysis and Design of RF Power Links for Low-Power Bionic Systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbcas.2007.893180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.