Cited by 99Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

A Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring SoC Based on Single Wavelength Photoplethysmography

Hina, Aminah, Saadeh, Wala·2020·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems

Abstract

Conventional glucose monitoring methods for the growing numbers of diabetic patients around the world are invasive, painful, costly and, time-consuming. Complications aroused due to the abnormal blood sugar levels in diabetic patients have created the necessity for continuous noninvasive glucose monitoring. This article presents a wearable system for glucose monitoring based on a single wavelength near-infrared (NIR) Photoplethysmography (PPG) combined with machine-learning regression (MLR). The PPG readout circuit consists of a switched capacitor Transimpedance amplifier with 1 MΩ gain and a 10-Hz switched capacitor LPF. It allows a DC bias current rejection up to 20 μA with an input-referred current noise of 7.3 pA/√Hz. The proposed digital processor eliminates motion artifacts, and baseline drifts from PPG signal, extracts six distinct features and finally predicts the blood glucose level using Support Vector Regression with Fine Gaussian kernel (FGSVR) MLR. A novel piece-wise linear (PWL) approach for the exponential function is proposed to realize the FGSVR on-chip. The overall system is implemented using a 180 nm CMOS process with a chip area of 4.0 mm2while consuming 1.62 mW. The glucose measurements are performed for 200 subjects with R2of 0.937. The proposed system accurately predicts the sugar level with a mean absolute relative difference (mARD) of 7.62%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbcas.2020.2979514

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hina, A., & Saadeh, W.
Affiliations
Lahore University of Management Sciences (PK)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
Published
2020-06
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
504-515
ISSN
  • 1932-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9990
OpenAlex
W3011056083
Cited by
99
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Higher Education Commission (7982/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
non-invasive glucose monitoring, photoplethysmography, near-infrared, wearable sensors, motion artifact removal, baseline drift removal, support vector regression, piecewise linear approximation, diabetes mellitus, CMOS integrated circuit
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Amplifiers, Electronic, Blood Glucose, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Photoplethysmography, Young Adult, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review