Cited by 670EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials

Blankertz, B., Muller, K.-R., Curio, G., Vaughan, T.M., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Schlogl, A., Neuper, C. +4 more·2004·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Interest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication--a brain-computer interface (BCI)--has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2004.826692

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blankertz, B., Muller, K.-R., Curio, G., Vaughan, T. M., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J. R., Schlogl, A., Neuper, C., Pfurtscheller, G., Hinterberger, T., Schroder, M., & Birbaumer, N.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Dept. of Neurology, Charite Univ. Med., Berlin, Germany
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2004-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1044-1051
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2153912116
Cited by
670
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 24
FWCI
20.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 00856, R01EB000856)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD030146, HD30146)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
brain-computer interface, event detection, event discrimination, signal classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review