Cited by 927EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems

Open access
Blankertz, B., Muller, K.-R., Krusienski, D.J., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Schlogl, A., Pfurtscheller, G., Millan, Jd.R. +2 more·2006·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a system that allows its users to control external devices with brain activity. Although the proof-of-concept was given decades ago, the reliable translation of user intent into device control commands is still a major challenge. Success requires the effective interaction of two adaptive controllers: the user's brain, which produces brain activity that encodes intent, and the BCI system, which translates that activity into device control commands. In order to facilitate this interaction, many laboratories are exploring a variety of signal analysis techniques to improve the adaptation of the BCI system to the user. In the literature, many machine learning and pattern classification algorithms have been reported to give impressive results when applied to BCI data in offline analyses. However, it is more difficult to evaluate their relative value for actual online use. BCI data competitions have been organized to provide objective formal evaluations of alternative methods. Prompted by the great interest in the first two BCI Competitions, we organized the third BCI Competition to address several of the most difficult and important analysis problems in BCI research. The paper describes the data sets that were provided to the competitors and gives an overview of the results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2006.875642

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blankertz, B., Muller, K.-R., Krusienski, D. J., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J. R., Schlogl, A., Pfurtscheller, G., Millan, J. R., Schroder, M., & Birbaumer, N.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (DE)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2006-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
153-159
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2101629643
Cited by
927
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 36
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Defense Technology
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 00856, R01EB000856)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD030146, HD30146)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
brain-computer interface, BCI Competition III, pattern classification, signal analysis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Software Validation, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review