The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Error-Related EEG Potentials Generated During Simulated Brain–Computer Interaction
Open accessAbstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are prone to errors in the recognition of subject's intent. An elegant approach to improve the accuracy of BCIs consists in a verification procedure directly based on the presence of error-related potentials (ErrP) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded right after the occurrence of an error. Several studies show the presence of ErrP in typical choice reaction tasks. However, in the context of a BCI, the central question is: "Are ErrP also elicited when the error is made by the interface during the recognition of the subject's intent?"; We have thus explored whether ErrP also follow a feedback indicating incorrect responses of the simulated BCI interface. Five healthy volunteer subjects participated in a new human-robot interaction experiment, which seem to confirm the previously reported presence of a new kind of ErrP. However, in order to exploit these ErrP, we need to detect them in each single trial using a short window following the feedback associated to the response of the BCI. We have achieved an average recognition rate of correct and erroneous single trials of 83.5% and 79.2%, respectively, using a classifier built with data recorded up to three months earlier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details.
Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 3,329
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747 · Cited by 3,273
A neural system for error detection and compensation
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x · Cited by 2,862
ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00031-9 · Cited by 1,442
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G. P. H., & Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3850752 · Cited by 1,170
Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation
van Schie, H. T., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G. H., & Bekkering, H. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1239 · Cited by 485
Babiloni, F., Cincotti, F., Babiloni, C., Carducci, F., Mattia, D., Astolfi, L., Basilisco, A., Rossini, P. M., Ding, L., Ni, Y., et al. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.036 · Cited by 412
EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification
Wolpaw, J. R., Ramoser, H., McFarland, D. J., & Pfurtscheller, G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.712231 · Cited by 396
Blankertz, B., Dornhege, G., Schafer, C., Krepki, R., Kohlmorgen, J., Muller, K.-R., Kunzmann, V., Losch, F., & Curio, G. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2003.814456 · Cited by 226
Cited by
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: A 10 year update
Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2 · Cited by 2,239
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
BCILAB: a platform for brain–computer interface development
Kothe, C. A., & Makeig, S. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056014 · Cited by 412
Learning From EEG Error-Related Potentials in Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces
Chavarriaga, R., & Millan, J. D. R. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2010.2053387 · Cited by 277
EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Thorough Literature Survey
Hwang, H.-J., Kim, S., Choi, S., & Im, C.-H. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.780869 · Cited by 257
Teaching brain-machine interfaces as an alternative paradigm to neuroprosthetics control
Iturrate, I., Chavarriaga, R., Montesano, L., Minguez, J., & Millán, J. D. R. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13893 · Cited by 149
Spüler, M., Bensch, M., Kleih, S., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Kübler, A. (2012) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.11.082 · Cited by 144
A Feasibility Study for Validating Robot Actions Using EEG-Based Error-Related Potentials
Ehrlich, S. K., & Cheng, G. (2019) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0501-8 · Cited by 58
Miladinović, A., Ajčević, M., Battaglini, P. P., Silveri, G., Ciacchi, G., Morra, G., Jarmolowska, J., & Accardo, A. (2020) · IFMBE Proceedings · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_225 · Cited by 18
Ren, G., Kumar, A., Mahmoud, S. S., & Fang, Q. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1394107 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrez, P. W., & del R. Millan, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 923-929
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2152693668
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.