The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asynchronous P300-Based Brain--Computer Interfaces: A Computational Approach With Statistical Models
Abstract
Asynchronous control is an important issue for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) working in real-life settings, where the machine should determine from brain signals not only the desired command but also when the user wants to input it. In this paper, we propose a novel computational approach for robust asynchronous control using electroencephalogram (EEG) and a P300-based oddball paradigm. In this approach, we first address the mathematical modeling of target P300, nontarget P300, and noncontrol signals, by using Gaussian distribution models in a support vector margin space. Furthermore, we derive a method to compute the likelihood of control state in a time window of EEG. Finally, we devise a recursive algorithm to detect control states in ongoing EEG for online application. We conducted experiments with four subjects to study both the asynchronous BCI's receiver operating characteristics and its performance in actual online tests. The results show that the BCI is able to achieve an averaged information transfer rate of approximately 20 b/min at a low false positive rate (one event per minute).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Cover, T. M. (1965) · IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers · doi:10.1109/pgec.1965.264137 · Cited by 2,044
Curran, E. (2003) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00036-8 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?
Guger, C., Daban, S., Sellers, E., Holzner, C., Krausz, G., Carabalona, R., Gramatica, F., & Edlinger, G. (2009) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045 · Cited by 652
Iturrate, I., Antelis, J. M., Kubler, A., & Minguez, J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2009.2020347 · Cited by 512
Visual and Auditory Brain–Computer Interfaces
Gao, S., Wang, Y., Gao, X., & Hong, B. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2300164 · Cited by 449
A Hybrid BCI System Combining P300 and SSVEP and Its Application to Wheelchair Control
Li, Y., Pan, J., Wang, F., & Yu, Z. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2270283 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Guan, C., & Wang, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1754-1763
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2102627064
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.