The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of Respiratory Rate From Photoplethysmogram Data Using Time–Frequency Spectral Estimation
Abstract
We present a new method that uses the pulse oximeter signal to estimate the respiratory rate. The method uses a recently developed time-frequency spectral estimation method, variable-frequency complex demodulation (VFCDM), to identify frequency modulation (FM) of the photoplethysmogram waveform. This FM has a measurable periodicity, which provides an estimate of the respiration period. We compared the performance of VFCDM to the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and autoregressive (AR) model approaches. The CWT method also utilizes the respiratory sinus arrhythmia effect as represented by either FM or AM to estimate respiratory rates. Both CWT and AR model methods have been previously shown to provide reasonably good estimates of breathing rates that are in the normal range (12-26 breaths/min). However, to our knowledge, breathing rates higher than 26 breaths/min and the real-time performance of these algorithms are yet to be tested. Our analysis based on 15 healthy subjects reveals that the VFCDM method provides the best results in terms of accuracy (smaller median error), consistency (smaller interquartile range of the median value), and computational efficiency (less than 0.3 s on 1 min of data using a MATLAB implementation) to extract breathing rates that varied from 12-36 breaths/min.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The enigma of Mayer waves: facts and models.
JULIEN, C. (2006) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.11.008 · Cited by 670
Cited by
Ghamari, M. (2018) · International Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics · doi:10.15406/ijbsbe.2018.04.00125 · Cited by 945
Multiparameter Respiratory Rate Estimation From the Photoplethysmogram
Karlen, W., Raman, S., Ansermino, J. M., & Dumont, G. A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2246160 · Cited by 485
Physiological parameter monitoring from optical recordings with a mobile phone
Scully, C. G., Lee, J., Meyer, J., Gorbach, A. M., Granquist-Fraser, D., Mendelson, Y., & Chon, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2163157 · Cited by 452
Self-citationBreathing Rate Estimation From the Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram: A Review
Charlton, P. H., Birrenkott, D. A., Bonnici, T., Pimentel, M. A. F., Johnson, A. E. W., Alastruey, J., Tarassenko, L., Watkinson, P. J., Beale, R., & Clifton, D. A. (2018) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2017.2763681 · Cited by 379
Lee, K., Ni, X., Lee, J. Y., Arafa, H., Pe, D. J., Xu, S., Avila, R., Irie, M., Lee, J. H., Easterlin, R. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0480-6 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Chon, K. H., Dash, S., & Ju, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2054-2063
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2140147284
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.