The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ECG Signal Quality During Arrhythmia and Its Application to False Alarm Reduction
Abstract
An automated algorithm to assess electrocardiogram (ECG) quality for both normal and abnormal rhythms is presented for false arrhythmia alarm suppression of intensive care unit (ICU) monitors. A particular focus is given to the quality assessment of a wide variety of arrhythmias. Data from three databases were used: the Physionet Challenge 2011 dataset, the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, and the MIMIC II database. The quality of more than 33 000 single-lead 10 s ECG segments were manually assessed and another 12 000 bad-quality single-lead ECG segments were generated using the Physionet noise stress test database. Signal quality indices (SQIs) were derived from the ECGs segments and used as the inputs to a support vector machine classifier with a Gaussian kernel. This classifier was trained to estimate the quality of an ECG segment. Classification accuracies of up to 99% on the training and test set were obtained for normal sinus rhythm and up to 95% for arrhythmias, although performance varied greatly depending on the type of rhythm. Additionally, the association between 4050 ICU alarms from the MIMIC II database and the signal quality, as evaluated by the classifier, was studied. Results suggest that the SQIs should be rhythm specific and that the classifier should be trained for each rhythm call independently. This would require a substantially increased set of labeled data in order to train an accurate algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
Saeed, M., Villarroel, M., Reisner, A. T., Clifford, G., Lehman, L.-W., Moody, G., Heldt, T., Kyaw, T. H., Moody, B., & Mark, R. G. (2011) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31820a92c6 · Cited by 1,162
Self-citationLawless (1994) · doi:10.1097/00003246-199406000-00017 · Cited by 406
Chambrin, M.-C., Ravaux, P., Calvelo-Aros, D., Jaborska, A., Chopin, C., & Boniface, B. (1999) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001340051082 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Optimal Signal Quality Index for Photoplethysmogram Signals
Elgendi, M. (2016) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering3040021 · Cited by 320
A Review of Signal Processing Techniques for Electrocardiogram Signal Quality Assessment
Satija, U., Ramkumar, B., & Manikandan, M. S. (2018) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2018.2810957 · Cited by 295
Satija, U., Ramkumar, B., & Manikandan, M. S. (2019) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2877055 · Cited by 102
Reduction of false arrhythmia alarms using signal selection and machine learning
Eerikäinen, L. M., Vanschoren, J., Rooijakkers, M. J., Vullings, R., & Aarts, R. M. (2016) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/37/8/1204 · Cited by 48
Gambarotta, N., Aletti, F., Baselli, G., & Ferrario, M. (2016) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-016-1453-5 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Behar, J., Oster, J., Li, Q., & Clifford, G. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1660-1666
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2038436648
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ECG Signal Quality During Arrhythmia and Its Application to False Alarm Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2013.2240452
- The paper
- Behar, J., Oster, J., Li, Q., & Clifford, G. D. (2013). ECG Signal Quality During Arrhythmia and Its Application to False Alarm Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2013.2240452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.