The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shape Sensing Techniques for Continuum Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Continuum robots provide inherent structural compliance with high dexterity to access the surgical target sites along tortuous anatomical paths under constrained environments and enable to perform complex and delicate operations through small incisions in minimally invasive surgery. These advantages enable their broad applications with minimal trauma and make challenging clinical procedures possible with miniaturized instrumentation and high curvilinear access capabilities. However, their inherent deformable designs make it difficult to realize 3-D intraoperative real-time shape sensing to accurately model their shape. Solutions to this limitation can lead themselves to further develop closely associated techniques of closed-loop control, path planning, human-robot interaction, and surgical manipulation safety concerns in minimally invasive surgery. Although extensive model-based research that relies on kinematics and mechanics has been performed, accurate shape sensing of continuum robots remains challenging, particularly in cases of unknown and dynamic payloads. This survey investigates the recent advances in alternative emerging techniques for 3-D shape sensing in this field and focuses on the following categories: fiber-optic-sensor-based, electromagnetic-tracking-based, and intraoperative imaging modality-based shape-reconstruction methods. The limitations of existing technologies and prospects of new technologies are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview
Hill, K. O., & Meltz, G. (1997) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/50.618320 · Cited by 3,060
Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review
Webster, R. J., & Jones, B. A. (2010) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910368147 · Cited by 2,297
Review of the present status of optical fiber sensors
Lee, B. (2003) · Optical Fiber Technology · doi:10.1016/s1068-5200(02)00527-8 · Cited by 1,736
Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey
Burgner-Kahrs, J., Rucker, D. C., & Choset, H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2015.2489500 · Cited by 1,557
Kinematics for multisection continuum robots
Jones, B. A., & Walker, I. D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2005.861458 · Cited by 955
Statics and Dynamics of Continuum Robots With General Tendon Routing and External Loading
Rucker, D. C., & Webster III, R. J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2011.2160469 · Cited by 669
Mechanics Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Manipulators
Camarillo, D. B., Milne, C. F., Carlson, C. R., Zinn, M. R., & Salisbury, J. K. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2008.2002311 · Cited by 655
Continuum robots - a state of the art
Robinson, G., & Davies, J. B. C. (2003) · Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C) · doi:10.1109/robot.1999.774029 · Cited by 619
Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery
Mack, M. J. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.5.568 · Cited by 545
Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications
Franz, A. M., Haidegger, T., Birkfellner, W., Cleary, K., Peters, T. M., & Maier-Hein, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2321777 · Cited by 504
Cited by
Alambeigi, F., Aghajani Pedram, S., Speyer, J. L., Rosen, J., Iordachita, I., Taylor, R. H., & Armand, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2019.2946726 · Cited by 48
Shi, C., Zhang, H., Ni, X., & Wang, K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3311052 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, C., Luo, X., Qi, P., Li, T., Song, S., Najdovski, Z., Fukuda, T., & Ren, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1665-1678
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2544641369
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.