Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 957

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Learning Enables Accurate Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) With CT Images

Open access
Song, Ying, Zheng, Shuangjia, Li, Liang, Zhang, Xiang, Zhang, Xiaodong, Huang, Ziwang, Chen, Jianwen, Wang, Ruixuan, Zhao, Huiying, Chong, Yutian, Shen, Jun, Zha, Yunfei, Yang, Yuedong·2021·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A novel coronavirus (COVID-19) recently emerged as an acute respiratory syndrome, and has caused a pneumonia outbreak world-widely. As the COVID-19 continues to spread rapidly across the world, computed tomography (CT) has become essentially important for fast diagnoses. Thus, it is urgent to develop an accurate computer-aided method to assist clinicians to identify COVID-19-infected patients by CT images. Here, we have collected chest CT scans of 88 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from hospitals of two provinces in China, 100 patients infected with bacteria pneumonia, and 86 healthy persons for comparison and modeling. Based on the data, a deep learning-based CT diagnosis system was developed to identify patients with COVID-19. The experimental results showed that our model could accurately discriminate the COVID-19 patients from the bacteria pneumonia patients with an AUC of 0.95, recall (sensitivity) of 0.96, and precision of 0.79. When integrating three types of CT images, our model achieved a recall of 0.93 with precision of 0.86 for discriminating COVID-19 patients from others. Moreover, our model could extract main lesion features, especially the ground-glass opacity (GGO), which are visually helpful for assisted diagnoses by doctors. An online server is available for online diagnoses with CT images by our server (http://biomed.nscc-gz.cn/model.php). Source codes and datasets are available at our GitHub (https://github.com/SY575/COVID19-CT).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2021.3065361

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1148/radiol.2020200269 · DOI
  2. 10.1148/radiol.2020200274 · DOI · Paper page
  3. bradski, 2008, Learning OpenCV Computer Vision With the OpenCV Library
  4. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.476 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa029 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1148/radiol.2020200236 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/ppul.24431 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TIP.2017.2774041 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_26 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00399 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00872 · DOI

Cited by

See all 957

Metadata

Authors
Song, Y., Zheng, S., Li, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Wang, R., Zhao, H., Chong, Y., Shen, J., Zha, Y., & Yang, Y.
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2021-11-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
2775-2780
ISSN
  • 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9964
  • 2374-0043
OpenAlex
W3135243128
Cited by
957
References
9
FWCI
93.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1315405)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1611261, 61772566, 81801132, 81871332)
  • Guangdong Frontier and Key Tech Innovation Program (2018B010109006, 2019B020228001)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019A1515012207)
  • Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams (2016ZT06D211)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.