Cited by 96Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityTraffic control and management

Blockchain-based distributed software-defined vehicular networks: a dueling deep q-learning approach

Zhang, Dajun, Yu, F. Richard, Yang, Ruizhe·2019·IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking

Abstract

Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have become an essential part in smart transportation systems of modern cities. However, because of dynamicity and infrastructure-less of VANETs, the ever increasing number of network security issues become obstacles for the realization of smart cities. Software-defined VANETs have provided a reliable way to manage VANETs dynamically and securely. However, the traditionally centralized control plane makes it vulnerable to malicious nodes and results in performance degradation. Therefore, a distributed control plane is necessary. How to reach a consensus among multiple controllers under complex vehicular environment is an essential problem. In this paper, we propose a novel blockchain-based distributed software-defined VANET framework (block-SDV) to establish a secure architecture to overcome the above issues. The trust features of blockchain nodes, the number of consensus nodes, trust features of each vehicle, and the computational capability of the blockchain are considered in a joint optimization problem, which is modeled as a Markov decision process with state space, action space and reward function. Since it is difficult to be solved by traditional methods, we propose a novel dueling deep Q-learning (DDQL) with prioritized experience replay approach. Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed block-SDV framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tccn.2019.2944399

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works introduced efficient security analysis tools to investigate and prevent threat potential in order to ensure trustful smart contract execution on blockchain.

    “Particularly, recent works [301], [302] introduced efficient security analysis tools to investigate and prevent threat potential in order to ensure trustful smart contract execution on blockchain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, D., Yu, F. R., & Yang, R.
Affiliations
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking
Published
2019-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
1086-1100
ISSN
  • 2332-7731 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2045
OpenAlex
W2978169795
Cited by
96
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
vehicular ad hoc networks, software-defined networking, blockchain, distributed control plane, prioritized experience replay, Markov decision process, malicious node detection, network security, smart transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review