Cited by 25Advancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignLow-power high-performance VLSI design

Modeling CMOS Ring Oscillator Performance<newline/> as a Randomness Source

Guler, Ulkuhan, Dundar, Gunhan·2014·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers

Abstract

In order to maximize randomness of CMOS Ring Oscillators (RO) used in Random Number Generators (RNG), possibility of weak inversion operation of CMOS transistors is investigated. To predict weak inversion noise performance of RO, phase noise and jitter models of a CMOS RO in weak inversion operating region are obtained. Differential Ring Oscillator (DRO) and Inverter-based Ring Oscillator (IbRO) cases are both investigated. For each case, the model covers the flicker and the white noise component of phase noise and jitter. The derived models are verified by measurement results. 0.25$\mu$m standard CMOS process has been used with a supply voltage of 0.7 V for DRO and 0.5 V for IbRO. Furthermore, phase noise and jitter behavior of a CMOS RO in strong and weak inversion region are compared through analytical models, simulations, and measurements. Even though white noise component of phase noise uses two different models for weak and strong inversion regions of operation, these two models exhibit continuity. Flicker noise component in weak inversion is much lower than the one in strong inversion, which also reduces the corner frequency. For a fair comparison of randomness performances, a randomness parameter is defined and randomness equations are derived for each case.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsi.2013.2283993

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researches manifest flicker noise has an effect on random number generation, but these researches are insufficient to make an interpretation confidently.

    “And some researches manifest flicker noise has effect on random number generation [38], [39], while these researches are insufficient to make an interpretation confidently.”

    From True Random Number Generators Using Electrical Noise (2019) · cites this paper as [38]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guler, U., & Dundar, G.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
Published
2014-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
712-724
ISSN
  • 1549-8328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0806
OpenAlex
W2104004623
Cited by
25
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • International Brain Research Organization
  • ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
CMOS ring oscillator, random number generators, weak inversion, phase noise, jitter, differential ring oscillator, 1/f noise, white noise, low-voltage operation, strong inversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review