Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of the Application of Multiobjective Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems: Current Status and Further Directions

Fazzolari, Michela, Alcala, Rafael, Nojima, Yusuke, Ishibuchi, Hisao, Herrera, Francisco·2013·IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

Over the past few decades, fuzzy systems have been widely used in several application fields, thanks to their ability to model complex systems. The design of fuzzy systems has been successfully performed by applying evolutionary and, in particular, genetic algorithms, and recently, this approach has been extended by using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, which can consider multiple conflicting objectives, instead of a single one. The hybridization between multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and fuzzy systems is currently known as multiobjective evolutionary fuzzy systems. This paper presents an overview of multiobjective evolutionary fuzzy systems, describing the main contributions on this field and providing a two-level taxonomy of the existing proposals, in order to outline a well-established framework that could help researchers who work on significant further developments. Finally, some considerations of recent trends and potential research directions are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2201338

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Fazzolari, M., Alcala, R., Nojima, Y., Ishibuchi, H., & Herrera, F.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
2013-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
45-65
ISSN
  • 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0034
OpenAlex
W1977904727
Cited by
296
References
89
FWCI
29.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.