The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compressed-Domain Ship Detection on Spaceborne Optical Image Using Deep Neural Network and Extreme Learning Machine
Abstract
Ship detection on spaceborne images has attracted great interest in the applications of maritime security and traffic control. Optical images stand out from other remote sensing images in object detection due to their higher resolution and more visualized contents. However, most of the popular techniques for ship detection from optical spaceborne images have two shortcomings: 1) Compared with infrared and synthetic aperture radar images, their results are affected by weather conditions, like clouds and ocean waves, and 2) the higher resolution results in larger data volume, which makes processing more difficult. Most of the previous works mainly focus on solving the first problem by improving segmentation or classification with complicated algorithms. These methods face difficulty in efficiently balancing performance and complexity. In this paper, we propose a ship detection approach to solving the aforementioned two issues using wavelet coefficients extracted from JPEG2000 compressed domain combined with deep neural network (DNN) and extreme learning machine (ELM). Compressed domain is adopted for fast ship candidate extraction, DNN is exploited for high-level feature representation and classification, and ELM is used for efficient feature pooling and decision making. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, in comparison with the existing relevant state-of-the-art approaches, the proposed method requires less detection time and achieves higher detection accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_32 · Cited by 14,955
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Cited by
Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762307 · Cited by 3,400
A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications
Liu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, N., Liu, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 · Cited by 3,239
Ball, J. E., Anderson, D. T., & Chan, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Applied Remote Sensing · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.11.042609 · Cited by 746
Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms
Losing, V., Hammer, B., & Wersing, H. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.084 · Cited by 382
Gong, M., Yang, H., & Zhang, P. (2017) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.05.001 · Cited by 226
Car Detection from Low-Altitude UAV Imagery with the Faster R-CNN
Xu, Y., Yu, G., Wang, Y., Wu, X., & Ma, Y. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1155/2017/2823617 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, J., Deng, C., Huang, G.-B., & Zhao, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1174-1185
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2003059629
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 53.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.