Cited by 27Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningCryptography and Data Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Privacy-Encoded Federated Learning Against Gradient-Based Data Reconstruction Attacks

Liu, Hongfu, Li, Bin, Gao, Changlong, Xie, Pei, Zhao, Chenglin·2023·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple local clients to collaboratively train a global model, which can reduce privacy leakage by sharing model parameters instead of private datasets. However, recent works have revealed that gradient-based data reconstruction attacks, e.g., deep leakage from gradients (DLG), improved DLG (iDLG), and inverting gradients (IG), may still reveal private information by exploiting model parameters from a local client. Current privacy-preserving FL strategies, e.g., differential privacy or gradient compression, can handle such attacks to some extent, but seriously sacrifice their model accuracy. In this work, we propose a novel privacy-preserving FL method, named privacy-encoded FL (PEFL), to combat such data reconstruction attacks without degrading the model performance. The key concept of PEFL is that each large weight matrix of the neural network model is decomposed into multiple cascading sub-matrices, which thus establishes a novel privacy-encoded mechanism by introducing an entangling nonlinear mapping between model gradients and raw data. As such, multiple sub-matrices are directly trained in parallel at the local clients, but only partial sub-matrices are reported to a global server, which suffices to reconstruct the global model whilst increasing the complexity of the coupling between the model parameters and raw data. We provide a detailed analysis of the accuracy, security, and complexity of our method. As shown, it breaks the limit of classical defensive methods, by significantly reducing the risk of data reconstruction attacks yet not degrading the model performance. Compared to classical defenses, the proposed PEFL decreases the peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) between the reconstructed data and the raw data by ~20dB, without sacrificing the test accuracy. As a new paradigm for privacy-preserving FL, our proposed method has great potential in privacy-demanding learning applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2023.3309095

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3103320 · DOI
  2. Goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
  3. 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3043262 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TII.2019.2908210 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102252 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TETC.2020.3048671 · DOI
  7. McMahan, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, 1273
  8. 10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8_2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zhao, 2020, IDLG: Improved deep leakage from gradients, arXiv:2001.02610 · arXiv
  10. Geiping, 2020, Inverting gradients—How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?, arXiv:2003.14053 · arXiv
  11. Geyer, 2017, Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective, arXiv:1712.07557 · arXiv
  12. 10.1109/TIFS.2019.2925496 · DOI
  13. 10.21437/Interspeech.2015-354 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/MLHPC.2016.004 · DOI
  15. 10.18653/v1/D17-1045 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lin, 2017, Deep gradient compression: Reducing the communication bandwidth for distributed training, arXiv:1712.01887 · arXiv
  17. Tsuzuku, 2018, Variance-based gradient compression for efficient distributed deep learning, arXiv:1802.06058 · arXiv
  18. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00919 · DOI
  19. Mahoney, 2016, Lecture notes on randomized linear algebra, arXiv:1608.04481 · arXiv
  20. 10.1109/TVT.2022.3163786 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s42256-023-00642-4 · DOI
  22. Yu, Large scale private learning via low-rank reparametrization, 12208
  23. Konečný, 2016, Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency, arXiv:1610.05492 · arXiv
  24. Qiao, 2021, Communication-efficient federated learning with dual-side low-rank compression, arXiv:2104.12416 · arXiv
  25. 10.1109/TII.2019.2945367 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1109/TII.2021.3073925 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TITS.2021.3081560 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/3133956.3133982 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2787987 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1109/TII.2019.2941244 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.037 · DOI
  32. 10.1145/3458864.3466628 · DOI
  33. 10.1145/1536414.1536440 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Glorot, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, 249
  35. 10.1137/07070471X · DOI
  36. Wang, 2013, Improving CUR matrix decomposition and the Nyström approximation via adaptive sampling, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 14, 2729
  37. 10.1137/0710036 · DOI
  38. Wei, 2020, A framework for evaluating gradient leakage attacks in federated learning, arXiv:2004.10397 · arXiv
  39. Zhu, 2020, R-GAP: Recursive gradient attack on privacy, arXiv:2010.07733 · arXiv
  40. 10.2478/popets-2022-0014 · DOI
  41. Simonyan, 2014, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, arXiv:1409.1556 · arXiv
  42. Chellapilla, High performance convolutional neural networks for document processing, 1
  43. 10.1145/2964284.2967243 · DOI
  44. 10.1109/ICPR.2010.579 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Ilyas, Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features, 32, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, H., Li, B., Gao, C., Xie, P., & Zhao, C.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • China Aneng Construction Group Corporation Ltd., Beijing, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2023
Volume
18
Pages
5860-5875
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W4386232222
Cited by
27
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1805262, U61971050)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
federated learning, privacy preservation, neural network weights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review