Cited by 133Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFault Detection and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defect Detection in SEM Images of Nanofibrous Materials

Open access
Carrera, Diego, Manganini, Fabio, Boracchi, Giacomo, Lanzarone, Ettore·2017·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

Nanoproducts represent a potential growing sector and nanofibrous materials are widely requested in industrial, medical, and environmental applications. Unfortunately, the production processes at the nanoscale are difficult to control and nanoproducts often exhibit localized defects that impair their functional properties. Therefore, defect detection is a particularly important feature in smart-manufacturing systems to raise alerts as soon as defects exceed a given tolerance level and to design production processes that both optimize the physical properties and control the defectiveness of the produced materials. Here, we present a novel solution to detect defects in nanofibrous materials by analyzing scanning electron microscope images. We employ an algorithm that learns, during a training phase, a model yielding sparse representations of the structures that characterize correctly produced nanofiborus materials. Defects are then detected by analyzing each patch of an input image and extracting features that quantitatively assess whether the patch conforms or not to the learned model. The proposed solution has been successfully validated over 45 images acquired from samples produced by a prototype electrospinning machine. The low computational times indicate that the proposed solution can be effectively adopted in a monitoring system for industrial production.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2016.2641472

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 0, Electrospinz sem analyser, electrospinz Ltd

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carrera, D., Manganini, F., Boracchi, G., & Lanzarone, E.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2017-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
551-561
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W2562062856
Cited by
133
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
  • Ministry of Education
  • University and Research organizations
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
defect detection, nanofibrous materials, scanning electron microscopy images, sparse representation, anomaly detection, electrospinning, smart manufacturing, image patches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review