Cited by 49Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningCryptography and Data Security

ADFL: A Poisoning Attack Defense Framework for Horizontal Federated Learning

Guo, Jingjing, Li, Haiyang, Huang, Feiran, Liu, Zhiquan, Peng, Yanguo, Li, Xinghua, Ma, Jianfeng, Menon, Varun G. +1 more·2022·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

Recently, federated learning has received widespread attention, which will promote the implementation of artificial intelligence technology in various fields. Privacy-preserving technologies are applied to users’ local models to protect users’ privacy. Such operations make the server not see the true model parameters of each user, which opens wider door for a malicious user to upload malicious parameters and make the training result converge to an ineffective model. To solve this problem, in this article, we propose a poisoning attack defense framework for horizontal federated learning systems called ADFL. Specifically, we design a proof generation method for users to generate proofs to verify whether it is malicious or not. An aggregation rule is also proposed to make sure the global model has a high accuracy. Several verification experiments were conducted and the results show that our method can detect malicious user effectively and ensure the global model has a high accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2022.3156645

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both model and data poisoning produce malicious updates to the model training of FL systems, and it is difficult to detect such attackers.

    “Both methods will produce malicious updates to the model training of FL systems, and it is difficult to detect such attackers (Fang et al. 2020;Guo et al. 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Li, H., Huang, F., Liu, Z., Peng, Y., Li, X., Ma, J., Menon, V. G., & Igorevich, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Xidian University (CN)
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • SCMS Group of Educational Institutions (IN)
  • South Ural State University National Research University, Celabinsk, Russian Federation
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2022-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
6526-6536
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W4226057940
Cited by
49
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for Innovative Research Groups
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62121001, 61602360, 62172314, 61872283, 61802146, 61962022, 61672415, 61906075, 61872088)
  • National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (62125205)
  • Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2022JQ-603)
  • S&T Program of Hebei (20310102D)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M633473)
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019A1515011017, 2019A1515011920)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (21618332)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (2022GY-029)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (B16037)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
horizontal federated learning, poisoning attacks, malicious user detection, proof generation, aggregation rules, privacy-preserving machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review