Cited by 45Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Media Forensic Detection

Exploring Adversarial Attacks in Federated Learning for Medical Imaging

Open access
Darzi, Erfan, Dubost, Florian, Sijtsema, Nanna. M., van Ooijen, P.M.A·2024·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

Federated learning provides a privacy-preserving framework for medical image analysis but is also vulnerable to a unique category of adversarial attacks. This article presents an in-depth exploration of these vulnerabilities, emphasizing the potential for adversaries to execute attack transferability, a phenomenon where adversarial attacks developed on one model can be successfully applied to other models within the federated network. We delve into the specific risks associated with such attacks in the context of medical imaging, using domain-specific MRI tumor and pathology datasets. Our comprehensive evaluation assesses the efficacy of various known threat scenarios within a federated learning environment. The study demonstrates the system's susceptibility to multiple forms of attacks and highlights how domain-specific configurations can significantly elevate the success rate of these attacks. This analysis brings to light the need for defense mechanisms and advocates for a reevaluation of the current security protocols in federated medical image analysis systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2024.3423457

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The resilience of federated learning models in domains like cancer diagnosis using MRI is greatly increased by federated adversarial training frameworks, which rebuild global models utilizing adversarial data produced locally.

    “Furthermore, the resilience of FL models in domains like cancer diagnosis using MRI is greatly increased by federated adversarial training frameworks, which rebuild global models utilizing adversarial data produced locally.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darzi, E., Dubost, F., Sijtsema, N. M., & van Ooijen, P. M. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2024-12
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
13591-13599
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W4401942562
Cited by
45
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  • Technology for Oncology IL
  • Health Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
federated learning, adversarial attacks, attack transferability, medical image analysis, privacy preservation, pathology images, federated learning security, defense mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review