PreprintCited by 6,602Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks

Open access
Madry, Aleksander, Makelov, Aleksandar, Schmidt, Ludwig, Tsipras, Dimitris, Vladu, Adrian·2017·arXiv

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples---inputs that are almost indistinguishable from natural data and yet classified incorrectly by the network. In fact, some of the latest findings suggest that the existence of adversarial attacks may be an inherent weakness of deep learning models. To address this problem, we study the adversarial robustness of neural networks through the lens of robust optimization. This approach provides us with a broad and unifying view on much of the prior work on this topic. Its principled nature also enables us to identify methods for both training and attacking neural networks that are reliable and, in a certain sense, universal. In particular, they specify a concrete security guarantee that would protect against any adversary. These methods let us train networks with significantly improved resistance to a wide range of adversarial attacks. They also suggest the notion of security against a first-order adversary as a natural and broad security guarantee. We believe that robustness against such well-defined classes of adversaries is an important stepping stone towards fully resistant deep learning models. Code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/MadryLab/mnist_challenge and https://github.com/MadryLab/cifar10_challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1706.06083

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adversarial training has proven to be an effective method for defending against adversarial attacks.

    “Adversarial training has proven to be an effective method for defending against adversarial attacks [56].”
  • Merino et al. draw on Wang and Strong's distinction between intrinsic, contextual, accessibility, and representational aspects when using ISO/IEC 25012 and ISO/IEC 25024.

    “Merino et al. [47] draw on Wang and Strong [74]'s canonical distinction between the intrinsic, contextual, accessibility, and representational aspects of datasets when using the above mentioned industry standards ISO/IEC 25012 and ISO/IEC 25024.”

    From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The cited paper’s Introduction (p. 1) and optimization discussion (p. 3) concern adversarial robustness, not dataset-quality standards. Searches for Merino, Wang and Strong, ISO/IEC 25012 and 25024, and the four named quality aspects found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Contemporary authors continue to find value in existing data quality characterisations and conceptual structures.

    “contemporary authors continue to find value in existing data quality characterisations and conceptual structures.”

    From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    Section 2 (p. 3) discusses an optimization framework for adversarial robustness, not existing data-quality characterisations or their value to contemporary authors. A search for data-quality frameworks and dimensions found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing works in privacy-preserving federated learning are mostly developed based on homomorphic encryption, secure multiparty computation, and differential privacy.

    “Existing works in privacy-preserving federated learning are mostly developed based on the wellknown privacy-preserving techniques, including: (1) homomorphic encryption (HE), such as Paillier [90], Elgamal [91] and Brakerski-Gentry-Vaikuntanathan cryptosystems [92]; (2) Secure Multiparty Computation (SMC), such as garbled circuits [93] and secret sharing [94]; and (3) differential privacy (DP) [95”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1][1] Aharon Ben-Tal, Laurent El Ghaoui, and Arkadi Nemirovski. Robust optimization . Princeton University Press, 2009. -
  2. [11][11] Ian J Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2015. -
  3. [28][28] Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2014. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., & Vladu, A.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2640329709
Cited by
6,602
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 339 · 2025: 892 · 2024: 1288 · 2023: 1268 · 2022: 1005 · 2021: 880 · 2020: 534 · 2019: 286 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 13 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1553428, 1111109)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
adversarial robustness, adversarial attacks, adversarial examples, robust optimization, deep neural network, security guarantees, adversarial training, image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review