Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Small-Sized Object Detection Oriented Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Approach With Application to Defect Detection

Open access
Zeng, Nianyin, Wu, Peishu, Wang, Zidong, Li, Han, Liu, Weibo, Liu, Xiaohui·2022·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Object detection is a well-known task in the field of computer vision, especially the small target detection problem that has aroused great academic attention. In order to improve the detection performance of small objects, in this article, a novel enhanced multiscale feature fusion method is proposed, namely, the atrous spatial pyramid pooling-balanced-feature pyramid network (ABFPN). In particular, the atrous convolution operators with different dilation rates are employed to make full use of context information, where the skip connection is applied to achieve sufficient feature fusions. In addition, there is a balanced module to integrate and enhance features at different levels. The performance of the proposed ABFPN is evaluated on three public benchmark datasets, and experimental results demonstrate that it is a reliable and efficient feature fusion method. Furthermore, in order to validate the applicational potential in small objects, the developed ABFPN is utilized to detect surface tiny defects of the printed circuit board (PCB), which acts as the neck part of an improved PCB defect detection (IPDD) framework. While designing the IPDD, several powerful strategies are also employed to further improve the overall performance, which is evaluated via extensive ablation studies. Experiments on a public PCB defect detection database have demonstrated the superiority of the designed IPDD framework against the other seven state-of-the-art methods, which further validates the practicality of the proposed ABFPN.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2022.3153997

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Zeng, N., Wu, P., Wang, Z., Li, H., Liu, W., & Liu, X.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2022
Volume
71
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W4213436958
Cited by
523
References
60
FWCI
38.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.