Cited by 953Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Perceptual Generative Adversarial Networks for Small Object Detection

Open access
Li, Jianan, Liang, Xiaodan, Wei, Yunchao, Xu, Tingfa, Feng, Jiashi, Yan, Shuicheng·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Detecting small objects is notoriously challenging due to their low resolution and noisy representation. Existing object detection pipelines usually detect small objects through learning representations of all the objects at multiple scales. However, the performance gain of such ad hoc architectures is usually limited to pay off the computational cost. In this work, we address the small object detection problem by developing a single architecture that internally lifts representations of small objects to super-resolved ones, achieving similar characteristics as large objects and thus more discriminative for detection. For this purpose, we propose a new Perceptual Generative Adversarial Network (Perceptual GAN) model that improves small object detection through narrowing representation difference of small objects from the large ones. Specifically, its generator learns to transfer perceived poor representations of the small objects to super-resolved ones that are similar enough to real large objects to fool a competing discriminator. Meanwhile its discriminator competes with the generator to identify the generated representation and imposes an additional perceptual requirement - generated representations of small objects must be beneficial for detection purpose - on the generator. Extensive evaluations on the challenging Tsinghua-Tencent 100K [45] and the Caltech [9] benchmark well demonstrate the superiority of Perceptual GAN in detecting small objects, including traffic signs and pedestrians, over well-established state-of-the-arts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.211

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For small object detection, GAN can be used to enhance the features of small objects by narrowing the representations between small and large ones.

    “For small object detection, GAN can be used to enhance the features of small objects by narrowing the representations between small and large ones [198, 199].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [198]

  • Many recent pedestrian detection methods are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.

    “Many recent pedestrian detection methods [62], [63], [71], [55], [70], [57], [56] are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. jiang, 2016, Object detection and counting with low quality videos, Technical Report

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J., Liang, X., Wei, Y., Xu, T., Feng, J., & Yan, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
1951-1959
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625219738
Cited by
953
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 8
FWCI
21.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Tencent
  • National University of Singapore (R-263-000-C08-133)
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore
  • China Scholarship Council (201506030045)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
small object detection, super-resolution, representation transfer, perceptual loss, traffic sign detection, pedestrian detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review